Bertrand Russell idézet

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Az Elsõ Ok érve sem ér többet.
Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Ha erre azt feleljük, hogy egyszerûen a saját kedve szerint alkotta õket, minden különösebb ok nélkül, akkor azt találjuk, hogy van valami, ami nem engedelmeskedik törvényeknek, így a természeti törvények láncolata megszakad. Ha azt mondjuk, amit némely ortodoxabb teológus mond, hogy Istennek minden törvény esetében megvan az oka arra, hogy éppen azt a törvényt hozza, és nem mást -- az ok természetesen az, hogy a lehetõ legjobb világot teremtse (noha ezt a világ láttán nem gondolnánk) -- ha tehát volt ok az Isten által adott törvényekre, akkor Istennek magának is bizonyos törvényeknek kellett alávetnie magát, s ily módon nem jutottunk előbbre azzal, hogy bevezettük Istent, mint közvetítőt.
Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Egyéb

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

A matematika tanulmányozása

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

Miért nem vagyok keresztény? http://www.freeweb.hu/ateizmus/whynot.html

"A Liberal Decalogue" http://www.panarchy.org/russell/decalogue.1951.html, from "The Best Answer to Fanaticism: Liberalism", New York Times Magazine (16/December/1951); later printed in The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell (1969), vol. 3: 1944-1967, pp. 71-2
1950s
Kontextus: The Ten Commandments that, as a teacher, I should wish to promulgate, might be set forth as follows:
1. Do not feel absolutely certain of anything.
2. Do not think it worth while to proceed by concealing evidence, for the evidence is sure to come to light.
3. Never try to discourage thinking for you are sure to succeed.
4. When you meet with opposition, even if it should be from your husband or your children, endeavour to overcome it by argument and not by authority, for a victory dependent upon authority is unreal and illusory.
5. Have no respect for the authority of others, for there are always contrary authorities to be found.
6. Do not use power to suppress opinions you think pernicious, for if you do the opinions will suppress you.
7. Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.
8. Find more pleasure in intelligent dissent that in passive agreement, for, if you value intelligence as you should, the former implies a deeper agreement than the latter.
9. Be scrupulously truthful, even if the truth is inconvenient, for it is more inconvenient when you try to conceal it.
10. Do not feel envious of the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise, for only a fool will think that it is happiness.

Often paraphrased as "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."
Compare: "One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision." B. Russell, New Hopes for a Changing World (1951). Compare also: "The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity." W. B. Yeats, The Second Coming (1919).
See also: Dunning-Kruger effect, Historical Antecedents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect#Historical_antecedents.
1930s, Mortals and Others (1931-35)

Változat: The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.

1950s, What Desires Are Politically Important? (1950)
Kontextus: We love those who hate our enemies, and if we had no enemies there would be very few people whom we should love.
All this, however, is only true so long as we are concerned solely with attitudes towards other human beings. You might regard the soil as your enemy because it yields reluctantly a niggardly subsistence. You might regard Mother Nature in general as your enemy, and envisage human life as a struggle to get the better of Mother Nature. If men viewed life in this way, cooperation of the whole human race would become easy. And men could easily be brought to view life in this way if schools, newspapers, and politicians devoted themselves to this end. But schools are out to teach patriotism; newspapers are out to stir up excitement; and politicians are out to get re-elected. None of the three, therefore, can do anything towards saving the human race from reciprocal suicide.

Forrás: 1930s, The Conquest of Happiness (1930)

Fact and Fiction (1961), Part IV, Ch. 10: "Can War Be Abolished?", p. 276
1960s

Ch VIII: The World As It Could Be Made, p. 129-130
1910s, Proposed Roads To Freedom (1918)
Kontextus: One of the most horrible things about commercialism is the way in which it poisons the relations of men and women. The evils of prostitution are generally recognized, but, great as they are, the effect of economic conditions on marriage seems to me even worse. There is not infrequently, in marriage, a suggestion of purchase, of acquiring a woman on condition of keeping her in a certain standard of material comfort. Often and often, a marriage hardly differs from prostitution except by being harder to escape from. The whole basis of these evils is economic. Economic causes make marriage a matter of bargain and contract, in which affection is quite secondary, and its absence constitutes no recognized reason for liberation. Marriage should be a free, spontaneous meeting of mutual instinct, filled with happiness not unmixed with a feeling akin to awe: it should involve that degree of respect of each for the other that makes even the most trifling interference with liberty an utter impossibility, and a common life enforced by one against the will of the other an unthinkable thing of deep horror.

Forrás: Dear Bertrand Russell: A Selection of His Correspondence with the General Public 1950-68

Of Sir Richard Jebb, Some Cambridge Dons of the Nineties (1956)
1950s

Letter to W. W. Norton, 11 March, 1931
1930s

NY Times Magazine, as reported in High Points in the Work of the High Schools of New York City, Vol. 34 (1952), p. 46
1950s

The ABC of Relativity (1925), p. 166
1920s
Változat: "Most people would rather die than think; many do."

A Fresh Look at Empiricism: 1927-42 (1996), p. 283
Attributed from posthumous publications

"On Civil Disobedience", April 15th, 1961
1960s

Forrás: 1910s, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays http://archive.org/stream/mysticism00russuoft/mysticism00russuoft_djvu.txt (1918), Ch. 1: Mysticism and Logic

1920s, Why I Am Not a Christian (1927)

1930s, The Conquest of Happiness (1930)

Forrás: 1930s, The Conquest of Happiness (1930)

1920s, Marriage and Morals (1929)

Bertrand Russell's Best: Silhouettes in Satire (1958), "On Religion".<!--originally taken from What is an Agnostic? (1953).-->
1950s
Kontextus: I observe that a very large portion of the human race does not believe in God and suffers no visible punishment in consequence. And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that he would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt his existence.

1960s, The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell (1967-1969)
Kontextus: Three passions, simple but overwhelmingly strong, have governed my life: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind. These passions, like great winds, have blown me hither and thither, in a wayward course, over a deep ocean of anguish, reaching to the very verge of despair.

As quoted in The Reader's Digest, Vol. 37 (1940), p. 90; no specific source given.
Disputed
Változat: In all affairs – love, religion, politics, or business – it's a healthy idea, now and then, to hang a question mark on the things you have long taken for granted.

Part III: Man and Himself, Ch. 16: Ideas Which Have Become Obsolete, p. 158
Forrás: 1950s, New Hopes for a Changing World (1951)