Sören Kierkegaard Quotes
page 4
309 Quotes on Life's Complexities, Freedom, and Essence of Humanity

Explore Sören Kierkegaard's profound quotes that delve into life's complexities, freedom, self-love, and the essence of humanity. Be inspired by his wisdom on existence and faith, and experience the influence of this philosopher.

Søren Aabye Kierkegaard was a Danish theologian, philosopher, poet, social critic, and religious author known as the first existentialist philosopher. He wrote extensively on organized religion, Christianity, morality, ethics, psychology, and the philosophy of religion. Kierkegaard emphasized personal choice and commitment and criticized intellectuals who were quick to understand philosophical concepts. He focused on Christian ethics and the individual's subjective relationship with God through faith. Unlike atheistic existentialism, he advocated for Christian existentialism.

Kierkegaard's early work used pseudonyms to present different viewpoints in complex dialogue. His philosophical ideas include the subjective and objective truths, the knight of faith, angst (anxiety), faith as passion, and the three stages of life's way. He explored these ideas through his journal writings that spanned over 7,000 pages. Although Kierkegaard kept aspects of his life private in his journals, they offer valuable insights into his philosophy. His broken engagement to Regine Olsen is considered a significant influence on his work.

Born to an affluent family in Copenhagen, Kierkegaard was deeply influenced by his parents and their beliefs. His mother had a joyful disposition while his father was intellectually curious and interested in philosophy. Kierkegaard studied theology at the University of Copenhagen but was dissatisfied with traditional philosophy and wanted to lead a more human life beyond knowledge. Both his parents passed away before he reached adulthood.

Kierkegaard's writings initially gained limited recognition in Scandinavia but went on to strongly influence philosophy, theology, and Western culture by the mid-20th century.

✵ 5. May 1813 – 11. November 1855   •   Other names Sören Aabye Kierkegaard
Sören Kierkegaard photo
Sören Kierkegaard: 309   quotes 34   likes

Sören Kierkegaard Quotes

“The Spirit brings faith, the faith.”

Soren Kierkegaard, For Self-Examination, Hong p. 81
1850s, For Self-Examination (1851), It Is the Spirit Who Gives Life

“In vain do individual great men seek to mint new concepts and to set them in circulation — it is pointless. They are used for only a moment, and not by many, either, and they merely contribute to making the confusion even worse, for one idea seems to have become the fixed idea of the age: to get the better of one's superior. If the past may be charged with a certain indolent self-satisfaction in rejoicing over what it had, it would indeed be a shame to make the same charge against the present age (the minuet of the past and the gallop of the present). Under a curious delusion, the one cries out incessantly that he has surpassed the other, just as the Copenhageners, with philosophic visage, go out to Dyrehausen "in order to see and observe," without remembering that they themselves become objects for the others, who have also gone out simply to see and observe. Thus there is the continuous leap-frogging of one over the other — "on the basis of the immanent negativity of the concept", as I heard a Hegelian say recently, when he pressed my hand and made a run preliminary to jumping. — When I see someone energetically walking along the street, I am certain that his joyous shout, "I am coming over," is to me — but unfortunately I did not hear who was called (this actually happened); I will leave a blank for the name, so everyone can fill in an appropriate name.”

Journals IA 328, 1835
1830s, The Journals of Søren Kierkegaard, 1830s

“Out of love, God becomes man. He says: "See, here is what it is to be a human being."”

Source: 1840s, The Sickness unto Death (July 30, 1849), p. 161

“He fixed his definition thus: reflection is the possibility of the relation, consciousness is the relation, the first form of which is contradiction. He soon noted that, as a result, the categories of reflection are always dichotomous. For example ideality and reality, soul and body, to recognize – the true, to will – the good, to love – the beautiful, God and the world, and so on, these are categories of reflection. In reflection, these touch each other in such a way that a relation becomes possible. The categories of consciousness, on the other hand, are trichotomous, as language itself indicates, for when I say I am conscious of this, I mention a trinity. Consciousness is mind and spirit, and the remarkable thing is that when in the world of mind or spirit one is divided, it always becomes three and never two. Consciousness, therefore, presupposes reflection. If this were not true it would be impossible to explain doubt. True, language seems to contest this, since in most languages, as far as he knew, the word ‘doubt’ is etymologically related to the word ‘two’. Yet in his opinion this only indicated the presupposition of doubt, especially because it was clear to him that as soon as I, as spirit, become two, I am eo ipso three. If there were nothing but dichotomies, doubt would not exist, for the possibility of doubt lies precisely in that third which places the two in relation to each other. One cannot therefore say that reflection produces doubt, unless one expressed oneself backwards; one must say that doubt presupposes reflection, though not in a temporal sense. Doubt arises through a relation between two, but for this to take place the two must exist, although doubt, as a higher expression, comes before rather than afterwards.”

Johannes Climacus (1841) p. 80-81
1840s, Johannes Climacus (1841)

“Irony is a qualification of subjectivity.”

1840s, On the Concept of Irony with Continual Reference to Socrates (1841)

“Source: Without Authority by Soren Kierkegaard, Hong 1997 P. 145ff”

1850s, An Upbuilding Discourse December 20, 1850

“You have surely noticed among schoolboys, that the one that is regarded by all as the boldest is the one who has no fear of his father, who dares to say to the others, "Do you think I am afraid of him?" On the other hand, if they sense that one of their number is actually and literally afraid of his father, they will readily ridicule him a little. Alas, in men’s fear-ridden rushing together into a crowd (for why indeed does a man rush into a crowd except because he is afraid!) there, too, it is a mark of boldness not to be afraid, not even of God. And if someone notes that there is an individual outside the crowd who is really and truly afraid – not of the crowd, but of God, he is sure to be the target of some ridicule. The ridicule is usually glossed over somewhat and it is said: a man should love God. Yes, to be sure, God knows that man’s highest consolation is that God is love and that man is permitted to love Him. But let us not become too forward, and foolishly, yes, blasphemously, dismiss the tradition of our fathers, established by God Himself: that really and truly a man should fear God. This fear is known to the man who is himself conscious of being an individual, and thereby is conscious of his eternal responsibility before God.”

Søren Kierkegaard, Purity of Heart, 1847 Steere translation p. 196-197
1840s, Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits (1847), Purity of Heart (1847)

“I have needed God every day to defend myself against the abundance of thoughts.”

PV, p. 73; SV1, XIII, p. 559; Jon Bartley Stewart. 2008. Johan Ludvig Heiberg: Philosopher, Littérateur, Dramaturge, and Political Thinker. Museum Tusculanum Press.
Disputed

“This is the truth of the matter. In every human being there is a capacity, the capacity for knowledge. And every person - the most knowing and the most limited - is in his knowledge far beyond what he is in his life or what his life expresses. Yet this misrelation is of little concern to us. On the contrary, we set a high price on knowledge, and everyone strives for this knowledge more and more. "But," says the sensible person, "one must be careful about the direction one's knowing takes. If my knowing turns inward, against me, if I do not take care to prevent this, then knowing is the most intoxicating thing there is, the way to become completely intoxicated, since there then occurs an intoxicating confusion between the knowledge and the knower, so that the knower himself will resemble, will be, that which is known. If your knowing takes such a turn and you yield to it, it will soon end with your tumbling like a drunk man into actuality, plunging yourself recklessly into drunken action without giving the understanding and sagacity the time to take into proper consideration what is prudent, what is advantageous, what will pay. This is why we, the sober ones, warn you, not against knowing or against expanding your knowledge, but against letting your knowledge take an inward direction, for then it is intoxicating." This is thieves' jargon. It says that it is one's knowledge that, by taking the inward direction in this way, intoxicates, rather than that in precisely this way it makes manifest that one is intoxicated, intoxicated in one's attachment to this earthly life, the temporal, the secular, and the selfish. And this is what one fears, fears that one's knowing, turned inward, toward oneself, will expose the intoxication there, will expose that one prefers to remain in this state, will wrench one out of this state and as a result of such a step will make it impossible for one to slip back into that adored state, into intoxication. p. 118”

1850s, Judge For Yourselves! 1851 (1876)