“Drugs provide pleasure; they cannot provide happiness. For happiness, you need people.”
Source: Choice Theory (1997), p. 88
William Glasser was an American psychiatrist.
Glasser was the developer of W. Edwards Deming's workplace ideas, reality therapy and choice theory. His innovations for individual counseling, work environments and school, highlight personal choice, personal responsibility and personal transformation. Glasser positioned himself in opposition to conventional mainstream psychiatrists, who focus instead on classifying psychiatric syndromes as "illnesses" and prescribe psychotropic medications to treat mental disorders.
Based on his wide-ranging and consulting clinical experience, Glasser applied his theories to broader social issues, such as education, management, and marriage, to name a few. As a public advocate, Glasser warned the general public of potential detriments caused by older generations of psychiatry, wedded to traditional diagnosing of patients as having mental illnesses and prescribing medications. In his view, patients simply act out their unhappiness and lack of meaningful personal connection with important people in their life. Glasser advocated educating the general public about mental health issues; offering, post-modern frameworks for finding and following healthy therapeutic direction.
Wikipedia
“Drugs provide pleasure; they cannot provide happiness. For happiness, you need people.”
Source: Choice Theory (1997), p. 88
Source: Choice Theory (1997), p. 75
Source: Unhappy Teenagers A Way for Parents and Teachers to Reach Them (2002), p.14
Rewarding to Control
Unhappy Teenagers A Way for Parents and Teachers to Reach Them (2002)
“When we depress, we believe we are the victims of a feeling over which we have no control.”
[p.70]
Choice Theory (1997)
Source: Choice Theory (1997), p. 4
Source: Choice Theory (1997), p. 30
Source: Choice Theory (1997), p. 85
Source: Unhappy Teenagers A Way for Parents and Teachers to Reach Them (2002), p.9
Source: Choice Theory (1997), p. 105
Source: Choice Theory (1997), p. 62