“Women are hardly ever known in their true light, though they may love men, or become indifferent towards them, may give them delight, or abandon them, or may extract from them all the wealth that they possess.”

—  Vātsyāyana , book Kama Sutra

Source: Kama Sutra, p. 118

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Women are hardly ever known in their true light, though they may love men, or become indifferent towards them, may give…" by Vātsyāyana?
Vātsyāyana photo
Vātsyāyana 27
Indian logician

Related quotes

George MacDonald photo
John Calvin photo
Françoise Sagan photo

“Nothing becomes some women more than the prick of ambition. Love, on the contrary, may make them very dull.”

Dans un mois, dans un an (1957, Those Without Shadows, translated 1957)

Isaiah Berlin photo

“But to manipulate men, to propel them towards goals which you — the social reformer — see, but they may not, is to deny their human essence, to treat them as objects without wills of their own, and therefore to degrade them.”

Isaiah Berlin (1909–1997) Russo-British Jewish social and political theorist, philosopher and historian of ideas

Five Essays on Liberty (2002), Two Concepts of Liberty (1958)

Alfred, Lord Tennyson photo
Aurelius Augustinus photo
Confucius photo

“To give one's self earnestly to the duties due to men, and, while respecting spiritual beings, to keep aloof from them, may be called wisdom.”

Confucius (-551–-479 BC) Chinese teacher, editor, politician, and philosopher

Source: The Analects, Chapter VI

Oscar Wilde photo
Natalie Clifford Barney photo

“Why grab possessions like thieves, or divide them like socialists when you can ignore them like wise men: that you may belong to everything and everything be yours inclusive of yourself.”

Natalie Clifford Barney (1876–1972) writer and salonist

In "My Country 'tis of Thee", ADAM International Review, No. 299 (1962)
Context: I am beginning to have a healthy dread of possessions, be it of a country, a house, a being or even an idea. If we are bothered by possessions we cannot really live either from without or from within; we are the possession of our possessions. All wars and most loves come from the possessive instinct. Why grab possessions like thieves, or divide them like socialists when you can ignore them like wise men: that you may belong to everything and everything be yours inclusive of yourself.
Could we, and we can, have the vital necessities for all, we should do away with this cry of class and begin to differentiate between individuals.
Individual superiority can alone feed the soul and give back through some materialisation of itself this individualised wealth of being.

Karl Barth photo

Related topics