William Wordsworth (1770–1850) English Romantic poet
A Poet!—He Hath Put His Heart to School, l. 9 (1842).
William Wordsworth (1770–1850) English Romantic poet
A Poet!—He Hath Put His Heart to School, l. 9 (1842).
Samuel Rutherford (1600–1661) Scottish Reformed theologian
Source: Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers (1895), P. 51.
Sören Kierkegaard (1813–1855) Danish philosopher and theologian, founder of Existentialism
1850s, For Self-Examination (1851), It Is the Spirit Who Gives Life
“Imperceptible
It withers in the world,
This flower-like human heart.”
Ono no Komachi (825–900) Japanese poet
Source: Kenneth Rexroth's translations, One Hundred Poems from the Japanese (1955), p. 46
Sarada Devi (1853–1920) Hindu religious figure, spiritual consort of Ramakrishna
[In the Company of the Holy Mother, 348]
Max Stirner book The False Principle of our Education
Source: The False Principle of our Education (1842), p. 19
Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) logician, one of the first analytic philosophers and political activist
George William Russell (1867–1935) Irish writer, editor, critic, poet, and artistic painter
The Nuts of Knowledge (1903)
Carl Van Doren (1885–1950) American biographer
Preface
The Great Rehearsal (1948)
Context: The most momentous chapter in American history is the story of the making and ratifying of the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution has so long been rooted so deeply in American life — or American life rooted so deeply in it — that the drama of its origins is often overlooked. Even historical novelists, who hunt everywhere for memorable events to celebrate, have hardly touched the event without which there would have been a United States very different from the one that now exists; or might have been no United States at all.
The prevailing conceptions of those origins have varied with the times. In the early days of the Republic it was held, by devout friends of the Constitution, that its makers had received it somewhat as Moses received the Tables of the Law on Sinai. During the years of conflict which led to the Civil War the Constitution was regarded, by one party or the other, as the rule of order or the misrule of tyranny. In still later generations the Federal Convention of 1787 has been accused of evolving a scheme for the support of special economic interests, or even a conspiracy for depriving the majority of the people of their liberties. Opinion has swung back and forth, while the Constitution itself has grown into a strong yet flexible organism, generally, if now and then slowly, responsive to the national circumstances and necessities.