Richard Feynman citations
Page 4

Richard Phillips Feynman est un physicien américain, l'un des plus influents de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle, en raison notamment de ses travaux sur l'électrodynamique quantique, les quarks et l'hélium superfluide.

Il reformula entièrement la mécanique quantique à l'aide de son intégrale de chemin qui généralise le principe de moindre action de la mécanique classique et inventa les diagrammes qui portent son nom et qui sont désormais largement utilisés en théorie quantique des champs .

Pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il fut impliqué dans le développement de la bombe atomique américaine. Après la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il enseigna à l'université Cornell puis au Caltech où il effectua des travaux fondamentaux notamment dans la théorie de la superfluidité et des quarks. Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, Julian Schwinger et lui sont colauréats du prix Nobel de physique de 1965 pour leurs travaux en électrodynamique quantique. Vers la fin de sa vie, son action au sein de la commission d'enquête sur l'accident de la navette spatiale Challenger l'a fait connaître du grand public américain.

Pédagogue remarquable, il est le rédacteur de nombreux ouvrages de vulgarisation reconnus. Parmi ces livres, les Feynman lectures on physics, un cours de physique de niveau universitaire qui, depuis sa parution, est devenu un classique pour tous les étudiants de premier cycle en physique et leurs professeurs. Il raconte aussi ses nombreuses aventures dans plusieurs ouvrages : Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! et What Do You Care What Other People Think?. Ce tome est lié au soutien moral que sa première épouse Arline lui donnait, l'encourageant par ce biais dans sa poursuite intellectuelle en tant que libre-penseur. Wikipedia  

✵ 11. mai 1918 – 15. février 1988   •   Autres noms Richard Feynman Philips, Richard Phillips Feynman, Ричард Филлипс Фейнман
Richard Feynman photo
Richard Feynman: 186   citations 4   J'aime

Richard Feynman citations célèbres

“Je pense pouvoir dire sans trop me tromper que personne ne comprend la mécanique quantique.”

I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics
en

“Si, dans un cataclysme, toute notre connaissance scientifique devait être détruite et qu'une seule phrase passe aux générations futures, quelle affirmation contiendrait le maximum d'informations dans le minimum de mots? Je pense que c'est l'hypothèse atomique (ou le fait atomique, ou tout autre nom que vous voudrez lui donner) que toutes les choses sont faites d'atomes - petites particules qui se déplacent en mouvement perpétuel, s'attirant mutuellement à petite distance les unes les autres et se repoussant lorsque l'on veut les faire se pénétrer. Dans cette seule phrase, vous verrez qu'il y a une énorme quantité d'information sur le monde, si on lui applique un peu d'imagination et de réflexion.”

If, in some cataclysm, all of scientific knowledge were to be destroyed, and only one sentence passed on to the next generations of creatures, what statement would contain the most information in the fewest words? I believe it is the atomic hypothesis (or the atomic fact, or whatever you wish to call it) that all things are made of atoms little particles that move around in perpetual motion, attracting each other when they are a little distance apart, but repelling upon being squeezed into one another. In that one sentence, you will see, there is an enormous amount of information about the world, if just a little imagination and thinking are applied.
en

“[…] nous avons toujours eu (chut, chut, fermez les portes!), nous avons toujours eu beaucoup de mal à comprendre l'image du monde que nous offre la mécanique quantique. Du moins, en ce qui me concerne, parce que je suis assez âgé, je ne suis pas encore parvenu à me convaincre que tous ces trucs-là étaient évidents. OK, ça m'énerve toujours. Ainsi quelques étudiants plus jeunes… Vous savez ce que c'est : à chaque nouvelle idée, il faut une ou deux générations pour constater qu'elle ne pose pas de vraie difficulté. Il n'est toujours pas évident pour moi qu'il n'y a pas de vrai problème. Je ne peux pas définir le vrai problème donc je soupçonne qu'il n'y a pas de vrai problème mais je ne suis pas sûr qu'il n'y ait pas de vrai problème.”

[...] we have always had (secret, secret, close the doors!) we have always have had a great deal of difficulty in understanding the world view that quantum mechanics represents. At least I do, because I'm an old enough man that I haven't got to the point that this stuff is obvious to me. Okay, I still get nervous with it. And therefore, some of the youngest students...you know how it always is, every new idea, it takes a generation or two until it becomes obvious that there's no real problem. It has not yet become obvious to me that there is no real problem. I cannot define the real problem, therefore I suspect there's no real problem, but I'm not sure there's no real problem.
en

“il s’agit en quelque sorte d’une caractéristique de la simplicité de la nature.”

sur le fait qu'il existe de nombreuses manières de formuler une même théorie, Discours de réception du prix Nobel.
Citation rapportée

Cette traduction est en attente de révision. Est-ce correct?

Richard Feynman: Citations en anglais

“I do feel strongly that this is nonsense! … So perhaps I could entertain future historians by saying I think all this superstring stuff is crazy and is in the wrong direction. I think all this superstring stuff is crazy and is in the wrong direction. … I don’t like it that they’re not calculating anything. … why are the masses of the various particles such as quarks what they are? All these numbers … have no explanations in these string theories – absolutely none! … I don’t like that they don’t check their ideas. I don’t like that for anything that disagrees with an experiment, they cook up an explanation—a fix-up to say, “Well, it might be true.” For example, the theory requires ten dimensions. Well, maybe there’s a way of wrapping up six of the dimensions. Yes, that’s all possible mathematically, but why not seven? When they write their equation, the equation should decide how many of these things get wrapped up, not the desire to agree with experiment. In other words, there’s no reason whatsoever in superstring theory that it isn’t eight out of the ten dimensions that get wrapped up and that the result is only two dimensions, which would be completely in disagreement with experience. So the fact that it might disagree with experience is very tenuous, it doesn’t produce anything.”

interview published in Superstrings: A Theory of Everything? (1988) edited by Paul C. W. Davies and Julian R. Brown, p. 193-194

“You know, the most amazing thing happened to me tonight. I was coming here, on the way to the lecture, and I came in through the parking lot. And you won't believe what happened. I saw a car with the license plate ARW 357. Can you imagine? Of all the millions of license plates in the state, what was the chance that I would see that particular one tonight? Amazing!”

from a public lecture, as quoted in David L. Goodstein, "Richard P. Feynman, Teacher," Physics Today, volume 42, number 2 (February 1989) p. 70-75, at p. 73
Republished in the "Special Preface" to Six Easy Pieces (1995), p. xxi.
Republished also in the "Special Preface" to the "definitive edition" of The Feynman Lectures on Physics, volume I, p. xiv.

“A person talks in such generalities that everyone can understand him and it's considered to be some deep philosophy. However, I would like to be very rather more special and I would like to be understood in an honest way, rather than in a vague way.”

Richard Feynman livre The Character of Physical Law

Source: The Character of Physical Law (1965), chapter 1, “The Law of Gravitation,” p. 13: video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mhkYbznBk&t=7m53s

“My mother … had a wonderful sense of humor, and I learned from her that the highest forms of understanding we can achieve are laughter and human compassion.”

Richard Feynman livre What Do You Care What Other People Think?

"The Making of a Scientist," p. 19
What Do You Care What Other People Think? (1988)

“So far as we know, all the fundamental laws of physics, like Newton’s equations, are reversible.”

volume I; lecture 46, "Ratchet and Pawl"; section 46-5, "Order and entropy"; p. 46-8
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)

“Energy is a very subtle concept. It is very, very difficult to get right.”

address " What is Science? http://www.fotuva.org/feynman/what_is_science.html", presented at the fifteenth annual meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, in New York City (1966), published in The Physics Teacher, volume 7, issue 6 (1969), p. 313-320

“I don't like honors. … I've already got the prize: the prize is the pleasure of finding the thing out, the kick in the discovery, the observation that other people use it. Those are the real things.”

Richard Feynman livre The Pleasure of Finding Things Out

Source: No Ordinary Genius (1994), p. 82, from interview in "The Pleasure of Finding Things Out" (1981): video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEwUwWh5Xs4&t=24m55s

“Since then I never pay attention to anything by "experts". I calculate everything myself.”

After having been led astray on neutron-proton coupling by reports of "beta-decay experts".
Part 5: "The World of One Physicist", "The 7 Percent Solution", p. 255
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (1985)

“Do not read so much, look about you and think of what you see there.”

letter to Ashok Arora, 4 January 1967, published in Perfectly Reasonable Deviations from the Beaten Track (2005) p. 230

“The Quantum Universe has a quotation from me in every chapter — but it's a damn good book anyway.”

Review blurb for the first edition of The Quantum Universe http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521564573 (1987)

“Every instrument that has been designed to be sensitive enough to detect weak light has always ended up discovering that the same thing: light is made of particles.”

Richard Feynman livre QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter

Source: QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (1985), p. 15

“I took this stuff I got out of your [O-ring] seal and I put it in ice water, and I discovered that when you put some pressure on it for a while and then undo it it doesn't stretch back. It stays the same dimension. In other words, for a few seconds at least, and more seconds than that, there is no resilience in this particular material when it is at a temperature of 32 degrees. I believe that has some significance for our problem.”

statement at hearing by Rogers Commission, 11 February 1986, Report of the PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, volume 4, p. 680 http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v4part4.htm#4; also quoted in Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman (1992) by James Gleick, p. 423

“If we suppress all discussion, all criticism, proclaiming "This is the answer, my friends; man is saved!" we will doom humanity for a long time to the chains of authority, confined to the limits of our present imagination. It has been done so many times before.”

The Value of Science (1955)
Contexte: We are at the very beginning of time for the human race. It is not unreasonable that we grapple with problems. But there are tens of thousands of years in the future. Our responsibility is to do what we can, learn what we can, improve the solutions, and pass them on.
... It is our responsibility to leave the people of the future a free hand. In the impetuous youth of humanity, we can make grave errors that can stunt our growth for a long time. This we will do if we say we have the answers now, so young and ignorant as we are. If we suppress all discussion, all criticism, proclaiming "This is the answer, my friends; man is saved!" we will doom humanity for a long time to the chains of authority, confined to the limits of our present imagination. It has been done so many times before.
... It is our responsibility as scientists, knowing the great progress which comes from a satisfactory philosophy of ignorance, the great progress which is the fruit of freedom of thought, to proclaim the value of this freedom; to teach how doubt is not to be feared but welcomed and discussed; and to demand this freedom as our duty to all coming generations.

“While in Kyoto I tried to learn Japanese with a vengeance. I worked much harder at it, and got to a point where I could go around in taxis and do things. I took lessons from a Japanese man every day for an hour.
One day he was teaching me the word for "see." "All right," he said. "You want to say, 'May I see your garden?' What do you say?"
I made up a sentence with the word that I had just learned.
"No, no!" he said. "When you say to someone, 'Would you like to see my garden?' you use the first 'see.' But when you want to see someone else's garden, you must use another 'see,' which is more polite."
"Would you like to glance at my lousy garden?" is essentially what you're saying in the first case, but when you want to look at the other fella's garden, you have to say something like, "May I observe your gorgeous garden?" So there's two different words you have to use.
Then he gave me another one: "You go to a temple, and you want to look at the gardens…"
I made up a sentence, this time with the polite "see."
"No, no!" he said. "In the temple, the gardens are much more elegant. So you have to say something that would be equivalent to 'May I hang my eyes on your most exquisite gardens?"
Three or four different words for one idea, because when I'm doing it, it's miserable; when you're doing it, it's elegant.
I was learning Japanese mainly for technical things, so I decided to check if this same problem existed among the scientists.
At the institute the next day, I said to the guys in the office, "How would I say in Japanese, 'I solve the Dirac Equation'?"
They said such-and-so.
"OK. Now I want to say, 'Would you solve the Dirac Equation?'”

how do I say that?"
"Well, you have to use a different word for 'solve,' " they say.
"Why?" I protested. "When I solve it, I do the same damn thing as when you solve it!"
"Well, yes, but it's a different word — it's more polite."
I gave up. I decided that wasn't the language for me, and stopped learning Japanese.
Part 5: "The World of One Physicist", "Would <U>You</U> Solve the Dirac Equation?", p. 245-246
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (1985)

“The electron is a theory we use; it is so useful in understanding the way nature works that we can almost call it real.”

Part 2: "The Princeton Years", "A Map of the Cat?", p. 70
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (1985)

“The "paradox" is only a conflict between reality and your feeling of what reality "ought to be."”

volume III; lecture 18, "Angular Momentum"; section 18-3, "The annihilation of positronium"; p. 18-9
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)

“If an apple is magnified to the size of the earth, then the atoms in the apple are approximately the size of the original apple.”

volume I; lecture 1, "Atoms in Motion"; section 1-2, "Matter is made of atoms"; p. 1-3
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)

Auteurs similaires

Albert Einstein photo
Albert Einstein 67
physicien allemand
Marie Curie photo
Marie Curie 3
physicienne et chimiste française d'origine polonaise
Richard Bach photo
Richard Bach 8
écrivain américain
Kurt Vonnegut photo
Kurt Vonnegut 29
écrivain américain
Jack London photo
Jack London 12
écrivain américain
John Steinbeck photo
John Steinbeck 18
écrivain américain
Maya Angelou photo
Maya Angelou 4
poétesse, actrice et militante américaine
Jack Kerouac photo
Jack Kerouac 11
écrivain et poète américain
Ray Bradbury photo
Ray Bradbury 20
écrivain américain
Francis Scott Fitzgerald photo
Francis Scott Fitzgerald 18
écrivain américain