“Je pense pouvoir dire sans trop me tromper que personne ne comprend la mécanique quantique.”
I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics
en
Richard Phillips Feynman est un physicien américain, l'un des plus influents de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle, en raison notamment de ses travaux sur l'électrodynamique quantique, les quarks et l'hélium superfluide.
Il reformula entièrement la mécanique quantique à l'aide de son intégrale de chemin qui généralise le principe de moindre action de la mécanique classique et inventa les diagrammes qui portent son nom et qui sont désormais largement utilisés en théorie quantique des champs .
Pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il fut impliqué dans le développement de la bombe atomique américaine. Après la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il enseigna à l'université Cornell puis au Caltech où il effectua des travaux fondamentaux notamment dans la théorie de la superfluidité et des quarks. Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, Julian Schwinger et lui sont colauréats du prix Nobel de physique de 1965 pour leurs travaux en électrodynamique quantique. Vers la fin de sa vie, son action au sein de la commission d'enquête sur l'accident de la navette spatiale Challenger l'a fait connaître du grand public américain.
Pédagogue remarquable, il est le rédacteur de nombreux ouvrages de vulgarisation reconnus. Parmi ces livres, les Feynman lectures on physics, un cours de physique de niveau universitaire qui, depuis sa parution, est devenu un classique pour tous les étudiants de premier cycle en physique et leurs professeurs. Il raconte aussi ses nombreuses aventures dans plusieurs ouvrages : Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! et What Do You Care What Other People Think?. Ce tome est lié au soutien moral que sa première épouse Arline lui donnait, l'encourageant par ce biais dans sa poursuite intellectuelle en tant que libre-penseur.
Wikipedia
“Je pense pouvoir dire sans trop me tromper que personne ne comprend la mécanique quantique.”
I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics
en
If, in some cataclysm, all of scientific knowledge were to be destroyed, and only one sentence passed on to the next generations of creatures, what statement would contain the most information in the fewest words? I believe it is the atomic hypothesis (or the atomic fact, or whatever you wish to call it) that all things are made of atoms little particles that move around in perpetual motion, attracting each other when they are a little distance apart, but repelling upon being squeezed into one another. In that one sentence, you will see, there is an enormous amount of information about the world, if just a little imagination and thinking are applied.
en
[...] we have always had (secret, secret, close the doors!) we have always have had a great deal of difficulty in understanding the world view that quantum mechanics represents. At least I do, because I'm an old enough man that I haven't got to the point that this stuff is obvious to me. Okay, I still get nervous with it. And therefore, some of the youngest students...you know how it always is, every new idea, it takes a generation or two until it becomes obvious that there's no real problem. It has not yet become obvious to me that there is no real problem. I cannot define the real problem, therefore I suspect there's no real problem, but I'm not sure there's no real problem.
en
“il s’agit en quelque sorte d’une caractéristique de la simplicité de la nature.”
sur le fait qu'il existe de nombreuses manières de formuler une même théorie, Discours de réception du prix Nobel.
Citation rapportée
address " What is Science? http://www.fotuva.org/feynman/what_is_science.html", presented at the fifteenth annual meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, in New York City (1966), published in The Physics Teacher, volume 7, issue 6 (1969), p. 313-320
“Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”
address " What is Science? http://www.fotuva.org/feynman/what_is_science.html", presented at the fifteenth annual meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, in New York City (1966), published in The Physics Teacher, volume 7, issue 6 (1969), p. 313-320
"The Development of the Space-Time View of Quantum Electrodynamics," Nobel Lecture http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html (11 December 1965)
letter to Robert Bacher (6 April 1950), quoted in Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman (1992) by James Gleick, p. 278
Source: The Character of Physical Law (1965), chapter 2, “The Relation of Mathematics to Physics”
volume I; lecture 35, "Color Vision"; 35-1 "The human eye"; p. 35-1
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)
Concerning the apparent absurdities of quantum behavior.
chapter 6, “Probability and Uncertainty — the Quantum Mechanical View of Nature,” p. 129
The Character of Physical Law (1965)
Source: The Character of Physical Law (1965), chapter 1, “The Law of Gravitation,” p. 27: video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mhkYbznBk&t=37m16s
“Hell, if I could explain it to the average person, it wouldn't have been worth the Nobel prize.”
statement (c. 1965), quoted in " An irreverent best-seller by Nobel laureate Richard Feynman gives nerds a good name http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20091337,00.html", People Magazine (22 July 1985)
What do you mean by you?"
volume I; lecture 8, "Motion"; section 8-1, "Description of motion"; p. 8-2
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)
lecture III: "This Unscientific Age"
David Goodstein reports http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/feynmaniacs-should-read-this-review-skip-lecture-collection-save-22-simoleons that the entire psychology department walked out in a huff at this point.
The Meaning of It All (1999)
Source: QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (1985), p. 3
“I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring.”
last words (15 February 1988), according to James Gleick, in Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman (1992), p. 438
Source: QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (1985), p. 13
Source: The Character of Physical Law (1965), chapter 3, “The Great Conservation Principles,” p. 75
lecture III: "This Unscientific Age"
The Meaning of It All (1999)
Rogers Commission Report (1986)
volume II; lecture 20, "Solution of Maxwell's Equations in Free Space"; section 20-3, "Scientific imagination"; p. 20-9 to 20-10
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)
Source: The Character of Physical Law (1965), chapter 1, “The Law of Gravitation,” p. 15: video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mhkYbznBk&t=12m45s
On his emotional reaction after the first uses of the atomic bomb.
Part 3: "Feynman, The Bomb, and the Military", "Los Alamos from Below", p. 136
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (1985)
Part 3: "Feynman, The Bomb, and the Military", "Los Alamos from Below", p. 132
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (1985)
volume I; lecture 1, "Atoms in Motion"; section 1-1, "Introduction"; p. 1-1
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)
volume II; lecture 41, "The Flow of Wet Water"; section 41-6, "Couette flow"; p. 41-12
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)
Part 5: "The World of One Physicist", "Is Electricity Fire?", p. 283
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (1985)
“Physics is to mathematics what sex is to masturbation.”
quoted in Lawrence M. Krauss, Fear of Physics: A Guide for the Perplexed (1993), p. 27
“I have to understand the world, you see.”
Part 4: "From Cornell to Caltech, With A Touch of Brazil", "Certainly, Mr. Big!", p. 231
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! (1985)
volume I; lecture 2, "Basic Physics"; section 2-1, "Introduction"; p. 2-1
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)
“Jiry, don't worry about anything. Go out and have a good time.”
Source: No Ordinary Genius (1994), p. 252, last words to his artist friend Jirayr Zorthian, as recalled by Zorthian in "No Ordinary Genius" (1993): video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fzg1CU8t9nw&t=1h33m22s
from the First Annual Santa Barbara Lectures on Science and Society, University of California at Santa Barbara (1975)
Rogers Commission Report (1986)