“It [animal research] is immoral even if it's essential.”
Washington Post 1989 May 30.
On animal research and activism against it
Ingrid E. Newkirk is a British animal welfarist and the president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals , the world's largest animal rights organization. She is the author of several books, including Making Kind Choices and The PETA Practical Guide to Animal Rights: Simple Acts of Kindness to Help Animals in Trouble .
Newkirk has worked for the animal-protection movement since 1972. Under her leadership in the 1970s as the District of Columbia's first female poundmaster, legislation was passed to create the first spay/neuter clinic in Washington, D.C., as well as an adoption program and the public funding of veterinary services, leading her to be among those chosen in 1980 as Washingtonians of the Year.Newkirk founded PETA in March 1980 with fellow animal rights activist Alex Pacheco. They came to public attention in 1981, during what became known as the Silver Spring monkeys case, when Pacheco photographed 17 macaque monkeys being experimented on inside the Institute of Behavioral Research in Silver Spring, Maryland. The case led to the first police raid in the United States on an animal research laboratory and to an amendment in 1985 to the Animal Welfare Act. Since then, Newkirk has led campaigns to stop the use of animals in crash tests, convinced companies to stop testing cosmetics on animals, pressed for higher welfare standards from the meat industry, and organized undercover investigations that have led to government sanctions against companies, universities, and entertainers who use animals. She is known, in particular, for the media stunts that she organizes to draw attention to animal-protection issues. In her will, for example, she has asked that her skin be turned into wallets, her feet into umbrella stands, and her flesh into "Newkirk Nuggets", then grilled on a barbecue. "We are complete press sluts", she told The New Yorker in 2003: "It is our obligation. We would be worthless if we were just polite and didn't make any waves."Although PETA takes a gradualist approach to improving animal welfare, Newkirk remains committed to ending animal use and the idea that, as PETA's slogan says, "animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment". Some animal rights abolitionists, most notably Gary Francione, have criticized PETA, calling it and other groups "the new welfarists". Some members of the animal advocacy movement have responded that Francione's position is unnecessarily divisive. Newkirk has also been criticized for her support of actions carried out in the name of the Animal Liberation Front. Newkirk's position is that the animal rights movement is a revolutionary one and that "[t]hinkers may prepare revolutions, but bandits must carry them out". PETA itself, however, "maintains a creed of nonviolence and does not advocate actions in which anyone, human or nonhuman, is injured". Newkirk and PETA have also been criticized for euthanizing many of the animals taken into PETA's shelters, including healthy pets, and opposition to the whole notion of pets, and her position that "There's no rational basis for saying that a human being has special rights. A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy," as well as seemingly seeing eradication as a goal. PETA has responded to this line of criticism.
Wikipedia
“It [animal research] is immoral even if it's essential.”
Washington Post 1989 May 30.
On animal research and activism against it
Montreal Mirror http://web.archive.org/20020703023107/www.montrealmirror.com/ARCHIVES/2002/032102/news3.html
In response to people who say it is natural to eat meat
Interview on CNN's Crossfire http://www.animalrights.net/archives/year/2002/000094.html (2002); in response to Tucker Carlson's description of a PETA member campaigning directly to his four-year-old son outside a circus.
2002
Satya, January, 2001 http://www.satyamag.com/jan01/newkirk.html.
2001
"Every Week There is More Reason to Feel Empathy for Animals" https://www.huffingtonpost.com/ingrid-newkirk/every-week-there-is-more_b_216409.html, Huffington Post, 17 July 2009.
2009
“Animal Rights 2002” convention, 2002 June 30
The Harper's Forum Book, Jack Hitt, ed., 1989, p. 223.
1980s
Ingrid Newkirk — taking on the critics http://www.animal-lib.org.au/more_interviews/ingrid/, Animal Liberation NSW.
2003
Vogue 1989 September 1
Attributed variants:
"When it comes to having a central nervous system, and the ability to feel pain, hunger, and thirst, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy"
"A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. They’re all animals." — Washingtonian magazine, 1986 August 1
The Chicago Daily Herald, 1990 March 1.
1990s
Veg Family, March, 2003 http://www.vegfamily.com/interviews/ingrid-newkirk.htm
New York Times, 2001 http://www.animalrights.net/quotes.html http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/jamieson/233771_robert23.html.
2001
“In the end, I think it would be lovely if we stopped this whole notion of pets altogether.”
Newsday, 1988 February 21.
1980s
Montreal Mirror http://web.archive.org/20020703023107/www.montrealmirror.com/ARCHIVES/2002/032102/news3.html.
On animal research and activism against it
The Washington Times, 1999 August 29
1990s
“I know it's illegal [trespassing], but I don't think it's wrong.”
Montgomery County, MD, Journal 1988 February 16.
On animal research and activism against it
Keynote address at the 2002 "Animal Rights" conference http://www.peta.org/feat/conference/
2002
“When I hear of anyone walking into a lab and walking out with animals, my heart sings.”
"To Market, To Market," Los Angeles Times Magazine, 1992 March 22.
On animal research and activism against it
During the hoof and mouth disease outbreak in Europe
speaking to onMilwaukee.com, 2005 February 1
2005
“Humans have grown like a cancer. We're the biggest blight on the face of the earth.”
Washingtonian magazine, 1990 February 1
Reader's Digest, June, 1990
1990s
“I will be the last person to condemn ALF [the Animal Liberation Front].”
The New York Daily News, 1997 December 7.
1990s
“Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human manipulation.”
Harper's, 1988 August 1.
1980s
ABC News interview, 2001 April 2
“Would I rather the research lab that tests animals is reduced to a bunch of cinders? Yes.”
New York Daily News, 1997 December 7.
On animal research and activism against it
“We do not advocate "right to life" for animals.”
On a postcard to Nathan Winograd, a neuter/release and no-kill shelter advocate http://www.nokillnow.com/PETAIngridNewkirkResign.htm.
On pets
Washingtonian Magazine, August, 1986.
On animal research and activism against it
Satya, January, 2001 http://www.satyamag.com/jan01/newkirk.html.
On pets
The Washington Post, 1983 November 13
"Mother Nature", The Observer 2003 June 22 http://observer.guardian.co.uk/magazine/story/0,11913,982402,00.html
2003
McGraw, Michael, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. "PETA and AIDS research" http://www.cnsnews.com/letterstotheeditor/letters_archive/2006/letters20060515.asp, Letters to the Editor, CNSNews.com, May 15, 2006.
On animal research and activism against it
Washington Post, 1983 November 13.
On animal research and activism against it
Satya, January, 2001 http://www.satyamag.com/jan01/newkirk.html.
On animal research and activism against it
Satya, November, 2000 http://www.satyamag.com/novdec00/newkirk.html.
2000
The Washington Post, 1983 November 13
India Together, July, 2000 http://www.indiatogether.org/reports/peta/newkirk.htm
2000
The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1999 November 12.
After The Justice Department mailed 87 razor blade–laced threats to medical researchers studying news drugs on primates.
On animal research and activism against it
Satya, November, 2000 http://www.satyamag.com/novdec00/newkirk.html
US News & World Report, 2002 April 8.
On animal research and activism against it
“I wish we all would get up and go into the labs and take the animals out or burn them down.”
"National Animal Rights Convention", 1997 June 27.
On animal research and activism against it
“More power to [Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty] if they can get someone’s attention.”
The Boston Herald, 2002 August 25.
2002
"Mother Nature", The Observer 2003 June 22 http://observer.guardian.co.uk/magazine/story/0,11913,982402,00.html
“I don’t use the word 'pet.' I think it’s speciesist language. I prefer 'companion animal.”
For one thing, we would no longer allow breeding. People could not create different breeds. There would be no pet shops. If people had companion animals in their homes, those animals would have to be refugees from the animal shelters and the streets. You would have a protective relationship with them just as you would with an orphaned child. But as the surplus of cats and dogs (artificially engineered by centuries of forced breeding) declined, eventually companion animals would be phased out, and we would return to a more symbiotic relationship — enjoyment at a distance.
The Harper's Forum Book, Jack Hitt, ed., 1989, p. 223.
1980s