“I approach drawing solely for structure.”
            David Bomberg "The Bomberg Papers", ed. Patrick Swift, X: A Quarterly Review, Vol 1, No 3, June 1960 
Context: Speaking generally Art endevours to reveal what is true and needs to be free. All things said regarding Art are subject to contradiction. An artist whose integrity sustains his strength to make no compromise with expediency is never degraded. His life work will resemble the integrating character of the primaries in the Spectrum. At the beginning, of the middle period, and at the end… I approach drawing solely for structure. I am perhaps the most unpopular artist in England – and only because I am draughtsman first and painter second. Drawing demands a theory of approach, until good drawing becomes habit – it denies all rules. It requires high discipline… Drawing demands freedom, freedom demands liberty to expand in space – this is progress. By the extension of democracy – good draughtsmanship is – Democracy’s visual sign. To draw with integrity replaces bad habits with good, youth preserved from corruption. The hand works at high tension and organises as it simplifies, reducing to barest essentials, stripping all irrelevant matter obstructing the rapidly forming organisation which reveals the design. This is drawing.
        
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
David Bomberg 7
painter 1890–1957Related quotes
 
                            
                        
                        
                        
                                        
                                        Quote of Turner's remark, c. 1799 to his colleague Joseph Farington; as cited in the  essay 'Draughtsman and Watercolourist', by David Blayney Brown http://www.tate.org.uk/art/research-publications/jmw-turner/essays-g2010028 on Tate.org 
Turner claimed then to have broken free of conventional methods 
1795 - 1820
                                    
Source: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter II, Section 10, pg. 58
 
                            
                        
                        
                        
                                        
                                        On Mind and Thought (1993), p. 34 
Posthumous publications 
Context: It is astonishingly beautiful and interesting, how thought is absent when you have an insight. Thought cannot have an insight. It is only when the mind is not operating mechanically in the structure of thought that you have an insight. Having had an insight, thought draws a conclusion from that insight. And then thought acts and thought is mechanical. So I have to find out whether having an insight into myself, which means into the world, and not drawing a conclusion from it is possible. If I draw a conclusion, I act on an idea, on an image, on a symbol, which is the structure of thought, and so I am constantly preventing myself from having insight, from understanding things as they are.
                                    
Source: "Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design." 1978, p. 613: Abstract
                                        
                                        Section 5: A Note on Ruskin's Writings on Society and Economics 
Ruskin Today (1964)
                                    
Source: Systems Engineering Tools, (1965), Systems Engineering Methods (1967), p. 107
 
        
    