Howard P. Robertson (1903–1961) American mathematician and physicist
Geometry as a Branch of Physics (1949)
[10.1016/0370-2693(82)90684-0, 1982, Spontaneous compactification of eleven-dimensional supergravity, Physics Letters B, 119, 4–6, 339–342]
Howard P. Robertson (1903–1961) American mathematician and physicist
Geometry as a Branch of Physics (1949)
Shiing-Shen Chern (1911–2004) mathematician (1911–2004), born in China and later acquiring U.S. citizenship; made fundamental contributio…
[On Riemannian manifolds of four dimensions, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 51, 12, 1945, 964–971, http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1945-51-12/S0002-9904-1945-08483-3/S0002-9904-1945-08483-3.pdf]
“all the standard equations of mathematical physics can be separated and solved in Kerr geometry.”
Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar (1910–1995) physicist
From Chandrasekhar's Nobel lecture, in his summary of his work on black holes; Republished in: D. G. Caldi, George D. Mostow (1989) Proceedings of the Gibbs Symposium: Yale University, May 15-17, 1989 p. 230
Hermann Weyl (1885–1955) German mathematician
On the foundations of general infinitesimal geometry. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 (1929) 716–725 [10.1090/S0002-9904-1929-04812-2] (quote on p. 716)
“Equations are just the boring part of mathematics. I attempt to see things in terms of geometry.”
Stephen Hawking (1942–2018) British theoretical physicist, cosmologist, and author
As quoted in Stephen Hawking: A Biography (2005) by Kristine Larsen, p. 43
Shiing-Shen Chern (1911–2004) mathematician (1911–2004), born in China and later acquiring U.S. citizenship; made fundamental contributio…
“If geometry exists, arithmetic must also needs be implied”
Nicomachus (60–120) Ancient Greek mathematician
Nicomachus of Gerasa: Introduction to Arithmetic (1926)
Context: If geometry exists, arithmetic must also needs be implied... But on the contrary 3, 4, and the rest might be 5 without the figures existing to which they give names. Hence arithmetic abolishes geometry along with itself, but is not abolished by it, and while it is implied by geometry, it does not itself imply geometry.<!--Book I, Chapter IV