“I was stupid, the official descriptive phrase for happy.”

Source: Why We Broke Up

Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "I was stupid, the official descriptive phrase for happy." by Daniel Handler?
Daniel Handler photo
Daniel Handler 190
American novelist, children's writer, creator of Lemony Sni… 1970

Related quotes

Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach photo

“The wiser head gives in! An immortal phrase. It founds the world dominion of stupidity.”

Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach (1830–1916) Austrian writer

Der Gescheitere gibt nach! Ein unsterbliches Wort. Es begründet die Weltherrschaft der Dummheit.
Aphorisms (1893), p. 6

Letitia Elizabeth Landon photo
John Locke photo
Julian Barnes photo
Gustave Flaubert photo

“To be stupid, selfish, and have good health are three requirements for happiness, though if stupidity is lacking, all is lost.”

Gustave Flaubert (1821–1880) French writer (1821–1880)

13 August 1846
Correspondence, Letters to Madame Louise Colet

Rik Mayall photo

“I can be gloriously stupid, but if it helps to divert peoples attentions from the grimness of life, I’m happy.”

Rik Mayall (1958–2014) British comedian and actor

Daily Mail, September 2003 https://rikmayallinterviews.wordpress.com/2012/07/17/deadlier-than-the-mayall/

Rachel Caine photo

“Happy birthday. And next time? Eat the stupid cupcake.”

Rachel Caine (1962) American writer

Source: Let Them Eat Cake

William H. Rehnquist photo

“An oft-heard description of the Supreme Court is that it is the ultimate protector in our society of the liberties of the individual. This phrase describes an important role of the Supreme Court, but by ignoring other equally important functions of the Court, it has a potential for mischief.”

William H. Rehnquist (1924–2005) Chief Justice of the United States

The Supreme Court: How it Was, How it Is (1987).
Books, articles, and speeches
Context: An oft-heard description of the Supreme Court is that it is the ultimate protector in our society of the liberties of the individual. This phrase describes an important role of the Supreme Court, but by ignoring other equally important functions of the Court, it has a potential for mischief. It is a fairly short leap from this language to a feeling that the US Constitution is somehow "vindicated" every time a claim of individual right against government is upheld, and is not vindicated whenever such a claim is not upheld. But this, of course, cannot be the case. The role of the Supreme Court is to uphold those claims of individual liberty that it finds are well-founded in the Constitution, and to reject other claims against the government that it concludes are not well-founded. Its role is no more to exclusively uphold the claims of the individual than it is to exclusively uphold the claims of the government: It must hold the constitutional balance true between these claims.

Milan Kundera photo

“I am not in favor of imposing happiness on people. Everyone has a right to his bad wine, to his stupidity, and to his dirty fingernails.”

Milan Kundera (1929–2023) Czech author of Czech and French literature

Source: Farewell Waltz

Related topics