K. R. Malkani (1921–2003) Indian politician
K.R. Malkani, quoted in Elst, Koenraad (2001). Decolonizing the Hindu mind: Ideological development of Hindu revivalism. New Delhi: Rupa. 525 ff.
343 U.S. 325
Judicial opinions, Zorach v. Clauson (1952)
K. R. Malkani (1921–2003) Indian politician
K.R. Malkani, quoted in Elst, Koenraad (2001). Decolonizing the Hindu mind: Ideological development of Hindu revivalism. New Delhi: Rupa. 525 ff.
“A tax-supported, compulsory educational system is the complete model of the totalitarian state.”
Isabel Paterson (1886–1961) author and editor
Source: The God of the Machine (1943), p. 258
Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn (1909–1999) Austrian noble and political theorist
Pg 67n
The Menace of the Herd (1943)
Edward Abbey (1927–1989) American author and essayist
Samuel Gompers (1850–1924) American Labor Leader[AFL]
Out of Their Own Mouths: A Revelation and an Indictment of Sovietism, New York: NY, E.P Dutton and Company (1921) p. 79, co-authored with William English Walling.
John Muir (1838–1914) Scottish-born American naturalist and author
12 November 1875, page 234
John of the Mountains, 1938
Pat Farenga American activist
"
A Brief History of Homeschooling (2002)
Robert H. Jackson (1892–1954) American judge
319 U.S. 641
Judicial opinions, West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)
William H. Rehnquist (1924–2005) Chief Justice of the United States
The Supreme Court: How it Was, How it Is (1987).
Books, articles, and speeches
Context: An oft-heard description of the Supreme Court is that it is the ultimate protector in our society of the liberties of the individual. This phrase describes an important role of the Supreme Court, but by ignoring other equally important functions of the Court, it has a potential for mischief. It is a fairly short leap from this language to a feeling that the US Constitution is somehow "vindicated" every time a claim of individual right against government is upheld, and is not vindicated whenever such a claim is not upheld. But this, of course, cannot be the case. The role of the Supreme Court is to uphold those claims of individual liberty that it finds are well-founded in the Constitution, and to reject other claims against the government that it concludes are not well-founded. Its role is no more to exclusively uphold the claims of the individual than it is to exclusively uphold the claims of the government: It must hold the constitutional balance true between these claims.