“They can only kill us once.”

Source: Left to Tell: Discovering God Amidst the Rwandan Holocaust

Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "They can only kill us once." by Immaculée Ilibagiza?
Immaculée Ilibagiza photo
Immaculée Ilibagiza 2
Rwandan writer 1972

Related quotes

Marcel Pagnol photo

“Honor is like a match, you can only use it once.”

Marcel Pagnol (1895–1974) novelist, playwright and filmmaker from France
Winston S. Churchill photo

“Politics are almost as exciting as war, and – quite as dangerous … [I]n war, you can only be killed once. But in politics many times.”

Winston S. Churchill (1874–1965) Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

From a conversational exchange with Harold Begbie, as cited in Master Workers, Begbie, Methuen & Co. (1906), p. 177.
Early career years (1898–1929)

Aesop photo

“Thinking to get at once all the gold the goose could give, he killed it and opened it only to find nothing.”

Aesop (-620–-564 BC) ancient Greek storyteller

The Goose with the Golden Eggs.

William the Silent photo

“Then Kill me at once!”

William the Silent (1533–1584) stadtholder of Holland, Zeeland and Utrecht, leader of the Dutch Revolt

Reply to the people who preferred Philip II over the Duke of Anjou, as quoted in William the Silent (1897) by Frederic Harrison

Will Rogers photo

“There is only one thing that can kill the Movies, and that is education.”

Will Rogers (1879–1935) American humorist and entertainer

Source: The Autobiography of Will Rogers (1949), Ch. 6

Marcus Tullius Cicero photo
André Malraux photo

“Once the masterpiece has emerged, the lesser works surrounding it fall into place; and it then gives the impression of having been led up to and foreseeable, though actually it is inconceivable — or, rather, it can only be conceived of once it is there for us to see it.”

André Malraux (1901–1976) French novelist, art theorist and politician

Part III, Chapter VI
Les voix du silence [Voices of Silence] (1951)
Context: Once the masterpiece has emerged, the lesser works surrounding it fall into place; and it then gives the impression of having been led up to and foreseeable, though actually it is inconceivable — or, rather, it can only be conceived of once it is there for us to see it. It is not a scene that has come alive, but a latent potentiality that has materialized. Suppose that one of the world's masterpieces were to disappear, leaving no trace behind it, not even a reproduction; even the completest knowledge of its maker's other works would not enable the next generation to visualize it. All the rest of Leonardo's oeuvre would not enable us to visualize the Mona Lisa; all Rembrandt's, the Three Crosses or The Prodigal Son; all Vermeer's, The Love Letter; all Titian's, the Venice Pietà; all medieval sculpture, the Chartres Kings or the Naumburg Uta. What would another picture by the Master of Villeneuve look like? How could even the most careful study of The Embarkation for Cythera, or indeed that of all Watteau's other works conjure up L'Enseigne de Gersaint, had it disappeared?

Jean Paul Sartre photo
Fred W. Friendly photo

“What we don't know as a nation and as a citizen can kill us.”

Fred W. Friendly (1915–1998) President of CBS News

Open Mind Interview https://www.archive.org/details/openmind_ep498?start=467

Related topics