William Stanley Jevons (1835–1882) English economist and logician
Introduction, Lesson I: Definition and Sphere of the Science.
Elementary Lessons on Logic (1870)
Adolphe Quételet. 1981. Letters addressed to H.R.H. the Grand Duke of Saxe Coburg and Gotha, on the theory of probability. Arno Press, p. 132
William Stanley Jevons (1835–1882) English economist and logician
Introduction, Lesson I: Definition and Sphere of the Science.
Elementary Lessons on Logic (1870)
George Biddell Airy (1801–1892) English mathematician and astronomer
Introduction
Popular Astronomy: A Series of Lectures Delivered at Ipswich (1868)
Diogenes Laërtius (180–240) biographer of ancient Greek philosophers
Plato, 51.
The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers (c. 200 A.D.), Book 3: Plato
Wilhelm Liebknecht (1826–1900) German socialist politician
No Compromise – No Political Trading (1899)
Christian Heinrich von Dillmann (1829–1899) German educationist
Source: Die Mathematik die Fackelträgerin einer neuen Zeit (Stuttgart, 1889), p. 12.
Leo Strauss (1899–1973) Classical philosophy specialist and father of neoconservativism
“What is liberal education,” p. 8
Liberalism Ancient and Modern (1968)
Rajendra Prasad (1884–1963) Indian political leader
From his speech given on 28 November 1960 at laying the foundation-stone of the building of the Law Institute of India, in: p. 15
Presidents of India, 1950-2003
Florence Nightingale (1820–1910) English social reformer and statistician, and the founder of modern nursing
Cassandra (1860)
Context: There is a physical, not moral, impossibility of supplying the wants of the intellect in the state of civilisation at which we have arrived. The stimulus, the training, the time, are all three wanting to us; or, in other words, the means and inducements are not there.
Look at the poor lives we lead. It is a wonder that we are so good as we are, not that we are so bad. In looking round we are struck with the power of the organisations we see, not with their want of power. Now and then, it is true, we are conscious that there is an inferior organisation, but, in general, just the contrary.