“Losing all hope was freedom.”

Variant: This was freedom. Losing all hope was freedom.
Source: Fight Club

Last update May 22, 2020. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Losing all hope was freedom." by Chuck Palahniuk?
Chuck Palahniuk photo
Chuck Palahniuk 555
American novelist, essayist 1962

Related quotes

Chuck Palahniuk photo
Richard Ford photo

“If you lose all hope, you can always find it again.”

Source: The Sportswriter

Walker Percy photo
Mark Z. Danielewski photo
Ai Weiwei photo

“Anyone fighting for freedom does not want to totally lose their freedom.”

Ai Weiwei (1957) Chinese concept artist

2000-09, Who Is Ai Weiwei?, 2009

W. Somerset Maugham photo

“If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too.”

W. Somerset Maugham (1874–1965) British playwright, novelist, short story writer

Strictly Personal, ch. 31 (1941)

Martin Luther King, Jr. photo
Walt Disney photo

“I only hope that we never lose sight of one thing — that it all started with a mouse.”

Walt Disney (1901–1966) American film producer and businessman

What Is Disneyland television program (27 October 1954)
Variants:
I only hope that we don't lose sight of one thing — that it all started with a mouse.
As quoted in The Story of Disney (2004) by Adele D. Richardson, p. 41
Variant: I only hope that we don’t lose sight of one thing — that it was all started by a mouse.

Margaret Thatcher photo

“Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can't have one without the other. You can't lose one without losing the other.”

Margaret Thatcher (1925–2013) British stateswoman and politician

Speech to Conservative Central Council ("The Historic Choice") (20 March 1976) http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/102990
Leader of the Opposition
Context: There are others who warn not only of the threat from without, but of something more insidious, not readily perceived, not always deliberate, something that is happening here at home. What are they pointing to? They are pointing to the steady and remorseless expansion of the Socialist State. Now none of us would claim that the majority of Socialists are inspired by other than humanitarian and well-meaning ideals. At the same time few would, I think, deny today that they have made a monster that they can't control. Increasingly, inexorably, the State the Socialists have created is becoming more random in the economic and social justice it seeks to dispense, more suffocating in its effect on human aspirations and initiative, more politically selective in its defence of the rights of its citizens, more gargantuan in its appetite—and more disastrously incompetent in its performance. Above all, it poses a growing threat, however unintentional, to the freedom of this country, for there is no freedom where the State totally controls the economy. Personal freedom and economic freedom are indivisible. You can't have one without the other. You can't lose one without losing the other.

Paul Claudel photo

“There is something sadder to lose than life – the reason for living;
Sadder than to lose one's possessions is to lose one's hope.”

Il y a une chose plus triste à perdre que la vie, c’est la raison de vivre,
Plus triste que de perdre ses biens, c’est de perdre son espérance.
L'otage (Paris: Édition de la Nouvelle revue française, 1911) p. 162; Pierre Chavannes (trans.) The Hostage (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1917) p. 130.

Related topics