China Miéville Quotes
page 2

China Tom Miéville is a British urban fantasy fiction author, essayist, comic book writer, socialist political activist and literary critic. He often describes his work as weird fiction and is allied to the loosely associated movement of writers called New Weird.

Miéville has won numerous awards, including the Arthur C. Clarke Award , the British Fantasy Award , Locus Awards for Best Fantasy Novel and Best Science Fiction Novel and Best Novelette and Best Young Adult Book, as well as the Hugo, Kitschies, and World Fantasy Awards.

Miéville is active in left-wing politics in the UK, and has previously been a member of the International Socialist Organization , and the short-lived International Socialist Network . He was formerly a member of the Socialist Workers Party, and in 2013 became a founding member of Left Unity. He stood for Regent's Park and Kensington North for the Socialist Alliance in the 2001 UK General election, gaining 1.2% of votes cast. He published his PhD thesis on Marxism and international law as a book in 2005. During 2012–13 he was writer-in-residence at Roosevelt University in Chicago. He became a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature in 2015. Wikipedia  

✵ 6. September 1972   •   Other names تشاينا ميفيل
China Miéville photo
China Miéville: 102   quotes 0   likes

China Miéville Quotes

“I am often asked is [my work] science fiction or fantasy and my answer is usually ‘Yes’.”

In a panel about his work in Comic Con 2010. Quoted in China Miéville Takes Comic Con http://www.tor.com/blogs/2010/08/china-mieville-takes-comic-con.

“I want to know everything, he says.”

“Anamnesis” (p. 202)
Iron Council (2004)

“It’s the first principle, isn’t it? Whoever’s arguing fiercest for violence is the cop.”

’Tis the Season (p. 195)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)

“I told myself I had no choice but in a situation like that the choice you have is how you go about not having a choice.”

The Dusty Hat (p. 211)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)

“We know the axes on which we should judge, and age has never been one.”

The Dusty Hat (p. 203)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)

“You were sick of sentimentality, of the moralism, maneuvering, and malice that comes with it.”

The Dusty Hat (p. 202)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)

“Do you even know why you’re angry with me?”

Simone shouted.
“Oh, I’ll figure something out,” Tova said.
After the Festival (p. 196)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)

“So what’s your alternative?”

people say, as if that’s logic. We don’t have to have an alternative, that’s not how critique works. We may do, and if we do, you’re welcome, but if we don’t that no more invalidates our hate for this, for what is, than does that of a serf for her lord, her flail-backed insistence that this must end, whether or not she accompanies it with a blueprint for free wage labour. Than does the millennially paced rage of the steepening shelf of the benthic plain for a system imposed by the cruelest and most crass hydrothermal vent, if that anemone-crusted angle of descent does not propose a submerged lake of black salt.
The Dusty Hat (p. 215)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)

“Abomination from one perspective, it was advertising copy from another.”

The 9th Technique (p. 102)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)

“They think I’m old-fashioned? Is being against racism and hatred old-fashioned? OK, I’m old-fashioned.”

The Junket (p. 320)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)

“What if the chosen one misunderstands what he’s been chosen for?”

The Tain (p. 301)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)

“You didn’t know, but not knowing is no excuse.”

The Tain (p. 254)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)

“This was not the time for rage but for politics and strategy.”

The Tain (p. 252)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)

“The other, more nebulous, but very strong influence of RPGs was the weird fetish for systematization, the way everything is reduced to “game stats.””

If you take something like Cthulhu in Lovecraft, for example, it is completely incomprehensible and beyond all human categorization. But in the game Call of Cthulhu, you see Cthulhu’s “strength,” “dexterity,” and so on, carefully expressed numerically. There’s something superheroically banalifying about that approach to the fantastic. On one level it misses the point entirely, but I must admit it appeals to me in its application of some weirdly misplaced rigor onto the fantastic: it’s a kind of exaggeratedly precise approach to secondary world creation.

Interview with Joan Gordon http://www.depauw.edu/sfs/interviews/mievilleinterview.htm

“I don’t want to be a simile anymore, I want to be a metaphor.”

Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 24 (p. 296)

“There wasn’t even any reasoning. Secrecy was just a bureaucrats’ reflex.”

Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 22 (p. 276)

“What theology that would have been, a god self-worshipping, a drug addicted to itself.”

Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 18 (p. 239)

“A scholar can never let mere wrongness get in the way of the theory.”

Source: “And there aren’t any.”
“Mmm,” I said. “Awkward.”
“That’s defeatist talk. I’ll cobble something together. A scholar can never let mere wrongness get in the way of the theory.”
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 0.3 (p. 37)

“It’s beyond words, there’s no such thing.”

Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 0.3 (p. 29)