interview with 3am http://www.3ammagazine.com/litarchives/2003/feb/interview_china_mieville.html
China Miéville Quotes
“I am often asked is [my work] science fiction or fantasy and my answer is usually ‘Yes’.”
In a panel about his work in Comic Con 2010. Quoted in China Miéville Takes Comic Con http://www.tor.com/blogs/2010/08/china-mieville-takes-comic-con.
“I want to know everything, he says.”
China Miéville book Iron Council
“Anamnesis” (p. 202)
Iron Council (2004)
China Miéville book Un Lun Dun
Source: Un Lun Dun (2007), Chapter 98, “Fit for Heroes” (p. 419)
“It’s the first principle, isn’t it? Whoever’s arguing fiercest for violence is the cop.”
’Tis the Season (p. 195)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)
China Miéville book Go Between
Go Between (p. 129)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)
China Miéville book Details
Details (p. 113)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)
Interview with Joan Gordon
China Miéville book The Scar
Part 7 “The Lookout”, chapter 47 (p. 557)
The Scar (2002)
China Miéville book Keep
Keep (p. 280)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
China Miéville book The Dusty Hat
The Dusty Hat (p. 211)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
“We know the axes on which we should judge, and age has never been one.”
China Miéville book The Dusty Hat
The Dusty Hat (p. 203)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
“You were sick of sentimentality, of the moralism, maneuvering, and malice that comes with it.”
China Miéville book The Dusty Hat
The Dusty Hat (p. 202)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
“Do you even know why you’re angry with me?”
China Miéville book After the Festival
Simone shouted.
“Oh, I’ll figure something out,” Tova said.
After the Festival (p. 196)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
China Miéville book The Dusty Hat
people say, as if that’s logic. We don’t have to have an alternative, that’s not how critique works. We may do, and if we do, you’re welcome, but if we don’t that no more invalidates our hate for this, for what is, than does that of a serf for her lord, her flail-backed insistence that this must end, whether or not she accompanies it with a blueprint for free wage labour. Than does the millennially paced rage of the steepening shelf of the benthic plain for a system imposed by the cruelest and most crass hydrothermal vent, if that anemone-crusted angle of descent does not propose a submerged lake of black salt.
The Dusty Hat (p. 215)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
“Abomination from one perspective, it was advertising copy from another.”
China Miéville book The 9th Technique
The 9th Technique (p. 102)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
China Miéville book The 9th Technique
The 9th Technique (p. 102)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
China Miéville book The Junket
The Junket (p. 320)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
China Miéville book The 9th Technique
The 9th Technique (p. 104)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
China Miéville book The 9th Technique
The 9th Technique (p. 101)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
China Miéville book The Design
The Design (p. 374)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
China Miéville book Dreaded Outcome
Dreaded Outcome (p. 159)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
China Miéville book The Design
The Design (p. 377)
Short Fiction, Three Moments of an Explosion (2015)
“What if the chosen one misunderstands what he’s been chosen for?”
China Miéville book The Tain
The Tain (p. 301)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)
“You didn’t know, but not knowing is no excuse.”
China Miéville book The Tain
The Tain (p. 254)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)
“This was not the time for rage but for politics and strategy.”
China Miéville book The Tain
The Tain (p. 252)
Short Fiction, Looking for Jake (2005)
If you take something like Cthulhu in Lovecraft, for example, it is completely incomprehensible and beyond all human categorization. But in the game Call of Cthulhu, you see Cthulhu’s “strength,” “dexterity,” and so on, carefully expressed numerically. There’s something superheroically banalifying about that approach to the fantastic. On one level it misses the point entirely, but I must admit it appeals to me in its application of some weirdly misplaced rigor onto the fantastic: it’s a kind of exaggeratedly precise approach to secondary world creation.<br><br>Interview with Joan Gordon http://www.depauw.edu/sfs/interviews/mievilleinterview.htm
“Their minds were sudden merchants: metaphor, like money, equalised the incommensurable.”
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 27 (p. 312)
“I don’t want to be a simile anymore, I want to be a metaphor.”
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 24 (p. 296)
“There wasn’t even any reasoning. Secrecy was just a bureaucrats’ reflex.”
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 22 (p. 276)
“What theology that would have been, a god self-worshipping, a drug addicted to itself.”
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 18 (p. 239)
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 15 (p. 213)
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 10 (p. 172)
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter “Formerly, 1” (p. 53)
“A scholar can never let mere wrongness get in the way of the theory.”
Source: “And there aren’t any.”
“Mmm,” I said. “Awkward.”
“That’s defeatist talk. I’ll cobble something together. A scholar can never let mere wrongness get in the way of the theory.”
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 0.3 (p. 37)
“It’s beyond words, there’s no such thing.”
Source: Embassytown (2011), Chapter 0.3 (p. 29)
