Richard M. Burton (1939)
Richard M. Burton, Bo Eriksen, Dorthe Døjbak Håkonsson (2008). Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. p. 5
Epigrams on Programming, 1982
Richard M. Burton (1939)
Richard M. Burton, Bo Eriksen, Dorthe Døjbak Håkonsson (2008). Designing Organizations: 21st Century Approaches. p. 5
Akber Choudhry (1967)
http://www.qern.org/en/robert-fisk-on-anonymous-internet-cowards-like-david-toube/.
Charles Perrow (1925–2019) American sociologist
Source: 1960s, "The analysis of goals in complex organizations", 1961, p. 854.
Earl Warren (1891–1974) United States federal judge
United States v. Robel (1967) - Findlaw file http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=389&invol=258 <br class="br">Context: This concept of "national defense" cannot be deemed an end in itself, justifying any exercise of legislative power designed to promote such a goal. Implicit in the term "national defense" is the notion of defending those values and ideals which set this Nation apart. For almost two centuries, our country has taken singular pride in the democratic ideals enshrined in its Constitution, and the most cherished of those ideals have found expression in the First Amendment. It would indeed be ironic if, in the name of national defense, we would sanction the subversion of one of those liberties — the freedom of association — which make the defense of our nation worthwhile.
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) German philosopher, poet, composer, cultural critic, and classical philologist
Variant: The end of a melody is not its goal: but nonetheless, had the melody not reached its end it would not have reached its goal either. A parable.
Margrit Kennedy (1939–2013) German architect
Source: Interest and Inflation Free Money (1995), Chapter Five, Money Reform & Global Transformation, p. 98
Herbert A. Simon book Administrative Behavior
Source: 1940s-1950s, Administrative Behavior, 1947, p. 62.
Albert Einstein (1879–1955) German-born physicist and founder of the theory of relativity
1940s, Religion and Science: Irreconcilable? (1948)
Context: Science, in the immediate, produces knowledge and, indirectly, means of action. It leads to methodical action if definite goals are set up in advance. For the function of setting up goals and passing statements of value transcends its domain. While it is true that science, to the extent of its grasp of causative connections, may reach important conclusions as to the compatibility and incompatibility of goals and evaluations, the independent and fundamental definitions regarding goals and values remain beyond science's reach.
As regards religion, on the other hand, one is generally agreed that it deals with goals and evaluations and, in general, with the emotional foundation of human thinking and acting, as far as these are not predetermined by the inalterable hereditary disposition of the human species. Religion is concerned with man's attitude toward nature at large, with the establishing of ideals for the individual and communal life, and with mutual human relationship. These ideals religion attempts to attain by exerting an educational influence on tradition and through the development and promulgation of certain easily accessible thoughts and narratives (epics and myths) which are apt to influence evaluation and action along the lines of the accepted ideals.