Robert G. Ingersoll (1833–1899) Union United States Army officer
The trial of Charles B. Reynolds for blasphemy (1887)
The trial of Charles B. Reynolds for blasphemy (1887)
Context: The question to be tried by you is whether a man has the right to express his honest thought; and for that reason there can be no case of greater importance submitted to a jury. And it may be well enough for me, at the outset, to admit that there could be no case in which I could take a greater — a deeper interest. For my part, I would not wish to live in a world where I could not express my honest opinions. Men who deny to others the right of speech are not fit to live with honest men.
I deny the right of any man, of any number of men, of any church, of any State, to put a padlock on the lips — to make the tongue a convict. I passionately deny the right of the Herod of authority to kill the children of the brain.
A man has a right to work with his hands, to plow the earth, to sow the seed, and that man has a right to reap the harvest. If we have not that right, then all are slaves except those who take these rights from their fellow-men.
Robert G. Ingersoll (1833–1899) Union United States Army officer
The trial of Charles B. Reynolds for blasphemy (1887)
“With tears we sow seeds of prayer in the earth of the heart, hoping to reap the harvest in joy.”
Diadochos of Photiki (400–486) Byzantine saint
§ 73
On Spiritual Knowledge and Discrimination (480 AD)
William Ernest Hocking (1873–1966) American philosopher
Source: Present Status of the Philosophy of Law and of Rights (1926), Ch. VII, Natural Right, § 32, p. 73.
“Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.”
Bernard Baruch (1870–1965) American businessman
Deming Headlight (New Mexico), 6 January 1950, as cited in the Yale Book of Modern Proverbs and at There Are Opinions, And Then There Are Facts; Freakonomics blog post by Fred R. Shapiro http://www.freakonomics.com/2011/08/18/there-are-opinions-and-then-there-are-facts/ (18 August 2011)
“It is a Reasonable presumption that a man who sleeps upon his rights has not got much right.”
Charles Bowen (1835–1894) English judge
Ex parte Hall; In re Wood (1883), L. R. 23 C. D. 653.
John Locke book Two Treatises of Government
Second Treatise of Government, Ch. V, sec. 27
Two Treatises of Government (1689)
Isabel Paterson (1886–1961) author and editor
Source: The God of the Machine (1943), p. 122
Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826) 3rd President of the United States of America
Letter to Oliver Evans (16 January 1814); published in The Writings of Thomas Jefferson (1905) Vol. 13, p. 66
1810s
Context: A man has a right to use a saw, an axe, a plane, separately; may he not combine their uses on the same piece of wood? He has a right to use his knife to cut his meat, a fork to hold it; may a patentee take from him the right to combine their use on the same subject? Such a law, instead of enlarging our conveniences, as was intended, would most fearfully abridge them, and crowd us by monopolies out of the use of the things we have.
“Where a man has but one remedy to come at his right, if he loses that he loses his right.”
John Holt (Lord Chief Justice) (1642–1710) English lawyer and Lord Chief Justice of England
2 Raym. Rep. 954.
Ashby v. White (1703)
Henry David Thoreau book A Plea for Captain John Brown
A Plea for Captain John Brown (1859)
Context: It was his peculiar doctrine that a man has a perfect right to interfere by force with the slaveholder, in order to rescue the slave. I agree with him. They who are continually shocked by slavery have some right to be shocked by the violent death of the slaveholder, but no others.