
“Great novelists are philosopher novelists — that is, the contrary of thesis-writers.”
The Myth of Sisyphus (1942), An Absurd Reasoning
This may have arisen as a paraphrase of statements found in The Myth of Sisyphus (1942), "An Absurd Reasoning", or one found in The Novelist as Philosopher: Studies in French Fiction 1935-1960 (1962) edited by John Cruikshank, p. 218
Disputed
“Great novelists are philosopher novelists — that is, the contrary of thesis-writers.”
The Myth of Sisyphus (1942), An Absurd Reasoning
In Pursuit of Valis: Selections from the Exegesis (1991)
Context: I am a fictionalizing philosopher, not a novelist; my novel and story-writing ability is employed as a means to formulate my perception. The core of my writing is not art but truth. Thus what I tell is the truth, yet I can do nothing to alleviate it, either by deed or explanation. Yet this seems somehow to help a certain kind of sensitive troubled person, for whom I speak. I think I understand the common ingredient in those whom my writing helps: they cannot or will not blunt their own intimations about the irrational, mysterious nature of reality, and, for them, my corpus of writing is one long ratiocination regarding this inexplicable reality, an investigation and presentation, analysis and response and personal history. My audience will always be limited to those people.
Letter to critic Stephen Pile, Sunday Times (London) (January 18, 1981)
“The most original novelist now writing in English.”
V. S. Pritchett, quoted in Time, April 4, 1955. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,866174-2,00.html.
Criticism
“I believe that only poetry counts… A great novelist is first of all a great poet.”
“The business of the novelist is not to relate great events, but to make small ones interesting.”
Source: The Works of Schopenhauer: The Wisdom of Life and Other Essays
Time to be Earnest - a Fragment of Biography Faber & Faber, London 1999.
Time to be Earnest - a Fragment of Biography