“Instead of starting from the individuality of the technical object, or even from its specificity, which is very unstable, try to define the laws of its genesis in the framework of this individuality or specificity, it is better to invert the problem: it is from the criterion of the genesis that we can define the individuality and the specificity of the technical object: the technical object is not this or that thing, given hic et nunc but that which is generated.”
Du mode d'existence des object technique (1958)
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Gilbert Simondon3
20th century French philosopher 1924–1989Related quotes
Émile Durkheim (1858–1917) French sociologist (1858-1917)
Sociology and philosophy (1911), D. Pocock, trans. (1974), p. 51.
Eric Hobsbawm (1917–2012) British academic historian and Marxist historiographer
Source: The Age of Revolution (1962), Chapter 13, Ideology: Secular
Karl Marx book Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844
Source: Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, p. 105, The Marx-Engels Reader
William Whewell (1794–1866) English philosopher & historian of science
Part 1, Book 1, ch. 2, sect. 7.
Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences (1840)
Philip Selznick (1919–2010) American sociologist
Source: Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation, 1957, p. 17
Gilbert Simondon (1924–1989) 20th century French philosopher
Source: Du mode d'existence des object technique (1958), p. 1 (http://www.academia.edu/4184556)