
Source: 1950s-1960s, Social Choice and Individual Values (1951), p. 7
Source: The Archiving Society, 1961, p. 417
Source: 1950s-1960s, Social Choice and Individual Values (1951), p. 7
Source: Aspects of the Novel (1927), Chapter Nine: Conclusion
Context: If human nature does alter it will be because individuals manage to look at themselves in a new way. Here and there people — a very few people, but a few novelists are among them — are trying to do this. Every institution and vested interest is against such a search: organized religion, the state, the family in its economic aspect, have nothing to gain, and it is only when outward prohibitions weaken that it can proceed: history conditions it to that extent.
Source: The Archiving Society, 1961, p. 40; As cited in: Kevin Hindle, Kim Klyver (2011), Handbook of Research on New Venture Creation, p. 74-75
Source: Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big Bang to the 21st Century (2000), Ch.4 From Social Synapses to Social Ganglions
Source: What is Anthropology? (2nd ed., 2017), Ch. 9 : Social Identity
(before 1880) As quoted in Renoir – his life and work, Francois Fosca, Book Club Associates /Thames and Hudson Ltd, London 1975, p. 176
undated quotes, Renoir – his life and work, 1975
These alterations... I shall—merely for convenience—term life.
The Ethic of Freethought (Mar 6, 1883)
"Worm for a Century, and All Seasons", p. 132
Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes (1983)