Source: Organizations: Theoretical Debates and the Scope of Organizational Theory, 2001, p. 1
“From the beginning, the forces of light and the forces of darkness have polarized the field of organizational analysis, and the struggle has been protracted and inconclusive. The forces of darkness have been represented by the mechanical school of organizational theory — those who treat the organization as a machine. This school characterizes organizations in terms o£ such things as:
:* centralized authority
:* clear lines of authority
:* specialization and expertise
:* marked division of labor
:* rules and regulations
:* clear separation of staff and line
The forces of light, which by mid-twentieth century came to be characterized as the human relations school, emphasizes people rather than machines, accommodations rather than machine-like precision, and draws its inspiration from biological systems rather than engineering systems. It has emphasized such things as:
:* delegation of authority
:* employee autonomy
:* trust and openness
:* concerns with the "whole person"
:* interpersonal dynamics
The forces of darkness formulated their position first, starting in the early part of this century. They have been characterized as the scientific management or classical management school…”
Source: 1970s, "The short and glorious history of organizational theory", 1973, p. 3
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Charles Perrow 71
American sociologist 1925–2019Related quotes
comprise a logically persuasive set of assumptions which have had a profound influence upon managerial behavior.
Source: The Human Side of Enterprise (1960), p. 15 (p. 21 in 2006 edition)
Source: The transformation of corporate control, 1993, p. 10 ; As cited in: François L'Italien, BÉHÉMOTH CAPITAL. Contribution à une théorie dialectique de la financiarisation de la grande corporation. Université Laval, 2012. p. 147 (Many of the following quotes came from this source)
Source: 1970s, Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View, 1970, p. 133
Source: The Human Side of Enterprise (1960), p. 15 (p. 21 in 2006 edition)
Eric Trist, "A concept of organizational ecology." Australian journal of management 2.2 (1977): 161-175. p. 161; abstract
Source: The Human Side of Enterprise (1960), p. 18 (2006; 24)
Source: Organizations: Theoretical Debates and the Scope of Organizational Theory, 2001, p. 1
Source: The Social Psychology of Organizations (1966), p. 34
Source: The Human Side of Enterprise (1960), p. 27 (in 2006 edition)