Kevin D. Williamson (1972) American writer
Trump's Omar Comments and Our Eroding Sense of Citizenship (2019)
Christian Homburg, Jan Wieseke, and Wayne D. Hoyer. "Social identity and the service-profit chain." Journal of Marketing 73.2 (2009). p. 54
Kevin D. Williamson (1972) American writer
Trump's Omar Comments and Our Eroding Sense of Citizenship (2019)
Seymour Papert book Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas
Source: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas (1980), Chapter 2, Mathophobia: The Fear of Learning
Roland W. Schmitt (1923–2017) American academic
in
Context: We hardly know the limit of intelligence of individuals who can fruitfully contribute to science in one way or another if they are given the proper training – including graduate training – as assistants, as supervised or semi-independent researchers, as team members. Individuals with any of a very broad spectrum of intellectual attributes can contribute to science.
Amartya Sen (1933) Indian economist
Source: The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity
Harold Kelley (1921–2003) American psychologist & academic
Source: "Attribution theory in social psychology." 1967, p. 193
Pierre Duhem (1861–1916) French physicist, historian of science
Notice sur les Titres et Travaux scientifiques de Pierre Duhem rédigée par lui-même lors de sa candidature à l'Académie des sciences (mai 1913), The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (1906)
Thomas Sowell (1930) American economist, social theorist, political philosopher and author
Will Property Rights Return?
1980s–1990s, Is Reality Optional? (1993)
John Adams (1735–1826) 2nd President of the United States
I, p. 448
1810s, Letters to John Taylor (1814)
Context: Liberty, according to my metaphysics, is an intellectual quality; an attribute that belongs not to fate nor chance. Neither possesses it, neither is capable of it. There is nothing moral or immoral in the idea of it. The definition of it is a self-determining power in an intellectual agent. It implies thought and choice and power; it can elect between objects, indifferent in point of morality, neither morally good nor morally evil. If the substance in which this quality, attribute, adjective, call it what you will, exists, has a moral sense, a conscience, a moral faculty; if it can distinguish between moral good and moral evil, and has power to choose the former and refuse the latter, it can, if it will, choose the evil and reject the good, as we see in experience it very often does.