Wassily Leontief (1906–1999) Russian economist
Source: Structure of American economy, 1919-1929, 1941, p. 74.
"The computer and the market" (1967)
Wassily Leontief (1906–1999) Russian economist
Source: Structure of American economy, 1919-1929, 1941, p. 74.
Thomas Little Heath (1861–1940) British civil servant and academic
Diophantos of Alexandria: A Study in the History of Greek Algebra (1885)
Alan O. Ebenstein (1959) American political scientist, educator and author
Hayek's Journey: The Mind of Friedrich Hayek (2003)
Gérard Debreu (1921–2004) French economist and mathematician
Arrow, Kenneth J., and Gerard Debreu. " Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cp/p00b/p0087.pdf." Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1954): p. 265
Kenneth Arrow (1921–2017) American economist
Source: 1950s-1960s, "Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy." 1954, p. 265
Ian Smith (1919–2007) Prime Minister of Rhodesia
Michael Knipe, "Mr Smith agrees to majority rule coming within two years", The Times, September 25, 1976, p. 1.
Statement (September 24, 1976) on negotiations in South Africa which proposed a phased transition to majority rule.
Leonid Kantorovich (1912–1986) Russian mathematician
"On one class of functional equations" (1936), as cited in: O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., " Leonid Kantorovich http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Kantorovich.html", MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews
Pierre Joseph Proudhon (1809–1865) French politician, mutualist philosopher, economist, and socialist
Source: What is Property? (1840), Ch. I: "Method Pursued in this Work. The Idea of a Revolution"
Context: If I were asked to answer the following question: What is slavery? and I should answer in one word, It is murder, my meaning would be understood at once. No extended argument would be required to show that the power to take from a man his thought, his will, his personality, is a power of life and death; and that to enslave a man is to kill him. Why, then, to this other question: What is property! may I not likewise answer, It is robbery, without the certainty of being misunderstood; the second proposition being no other than a transformation of the first?
I undertake to discuss the vital principle of our government and our institutions, property: I am in my right. I may be mistaken in the conclusion which shall result from my investigations: I am in my right. I think best to place the last thought of my book first: still am I in my right.
Ayelet Waldman (1964) American- Israeli writer
Blog post http://bad-mother.blogspot.com/2005/02/end.html<br>Regarding blogging