“It was one thing to use computers as a tool, quite another to let them do your thinking for you.”
Tom Clancy book The Hunt for Red October
Source: The Hunt for Red October
Source: 1960s, Julian (1964), Chapter 5
“It was one thing to use computers as a tool, quite another to let them do your thinking for you.”
Tom Clancy book The Hunt for Red October
Source: The Hunt for Red October
Christian Nestell Bovee (1820–1904) American writer
Source: Intuitions and Summaries of Thought (1862), Volume II, p. 124.
“It was one thing to decide to go to West Point, another to get there.”
Maxwell D. Taylor (1901–1987) United States general
Source: Swords and Plowshares (1972), p. 23
Moshe Goshen-Gottstein (1925–1991) Israeli linguist
Of his analysis of mediaeval Biblical manuscripts.
"Hebrew Biblical Manuscripts" (Biblica, 48 (1967), pp.243-290)
“Every one excels in something in which another fails.”
Publilio Siro Latin writer
Maxim 17
Sentences, The Moral Sayings of Publius Syrus, a Roman Slave
“Time moves in one direction, memory in another.”
William Gibson (1948) American-Canadian speculative fiction novelist and founder of the cyberpunk subgenre
“The next thing to saying a good thing yourself, is to quote one”
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882) American philosopher, essayist, and poet
This sentence has no known source in Emerson's works, but its general sense does closely match the tenor of Emerson's essay "Quotation and Originality", in particular the sentence "Next to the originator of a good sentence is the first quoter of it." (listed above).
Gow, Foundations for Human Engineering (1931) contains the following passage: "I have the backing of Emerson, for it was he, I believe, who said that the next thing to saying a good thing yourself, if to quote one". It is not clear whether Gow is purporting to quote Emerson verbatim, or merely to paraphrase his work.
Disputed
Anantanand Rambachan (1951) Hindu studies scholar
Source: The Nature and Authority of Scripture (1995), p. 20
Context: The famous Rgveda text, "One is the Truth, the sages speak of it differently" (1.64.46), is often employed to explain away doctrinal differences as merely semantic ones. The point of this text, as its context makes quite clear, is not really to dismiss the significance of the different ways in which we speak of the One or to see these ways as equally valid. The text is really a comment on the limited nature of human language. Such language must by nature be diverse in its attempts to describe that which is One and finally indescribable. The text, however, is widely cited in ways that seem to make interreligious dialogue redundant.
“That's certainly one point of view. Quite understandable.”
Constantine P. Cavafy (1863–1933) Greek poet
" In The Year 200 B.C. http://cavafis.compupress.gr/kave_1.htm" (1931) <br class="br">Context: The Spartans weren't to be led<br>and ordered around<br>like precious servants. Besides,<br>they wouldn't have thought a pan-Hellenic expedition<br>without a Spartan king in command<br>was to be taken very seriously.<br>Of course, then, "except the Lacedaimonians." That's certainly one point of view. Quite understandable.