Leo Strauss cytaty

Leo Strauss – niemiecko-amerykański myśliciel polityczny pochodzenia żydowskiego.

Zajmował się przede wszystkim filozofią polityczną i filozofią żydowską. Na University of Chicago, gdzie w latach 1949-1969 wykładał nauki polityczne, zgromadził wokół siebie znaczne grono słuchaczy , z których wielu zostało potem wpływowymi intelektualistami.

Strauss łączył analizy myślicieli zaliczanych do zachodniego kanonu filozofii z filozofami muzułmańskimi i żydowskimi. Stawiał tezę, że w XVI-XVII w. doszło do zasadniczej zmiany w filozofii, która odeszła od swoich klasycznych wzorców. Z tego powodu, zrozumienie przednowożytnych filozofów wymaga szczególnego wysiłku i metody badawczej. Szczególnie głośna była jego teza o "ezoterycznym sposobie pisania" wielkich filozofów. Zgodnie z nią, filozofowie obawiając się prześladowań i niezrozumienia ze strony społeczeństwa, ukrywali swoje właściwe poglądy. Możemy do nich dotrzeć jedynie przez głęboką analizę ich tekstów, badanie ich struktury, porównywanie fragmentów i wyszukiwanie sprzeczności. Wikipedia  

✵ 20. Wrzesień 1899 – 18. Październik 1973
Leo Strauss: 78   Cytatów 0   Polubień

Leo Strauss: Cytaty po angielsku

“The silence of a wise man is always meaningful.”

Leo Strauss książka Thoughts on Machiavelli

Źródło: Thoughts on Machiavelli (1958), p. 30

“All political action is then guided by some thought of better or worse.”

"What Is Political Philosophy" in The Journal of Politics, 19(3) (Aug. 1957) by the Southern Political Science Association, p. 343
Kontekst: All political action aims at either preservation or change. When desiring to preserve, we wish to prevent a change for the worse; when desiring to change, we wish to bring about something better. All political action is then guided by some thought of better or worse.

“Science is susceptible of infinite progress. But how can science be susceptible of infinite progress if its object does not have an inner infinity?”

"Why We Remain Jews" (1962)
Kontekst: Science, as the positivist understands it, is susceptible of infinite progress. That you learn in every elementary school today, I believe. Every result of science is provisional and subject to future revision, and this will never change. In other words, fifty thousand years from now there will still be results entirely different from those now, but still subject to revision. Science is susceptible of infinite progress. But how can science be susceptible of infinite progress if its object does not have an inner infinity? The belief admitted by all believers in science today — that science is by its nature essentially progressive, and eternally progressive — implies, without saying it, that being is mysterious. And here is the point where the two lines I have tried to trace do not meet exactly, but where they come within hailing distance. And, I believe, to expect more in a general way, of people in general, would be unreasonable.

“The truth of the ultimate mystery — the truth that there is an ultimate mystery, that being is radically mysterious — cannot be denied even by the unbelieving Jew of our age.”

Commenting upon the Aleinu prayer, in "Why We Remain Jews" (1962)
Kontekst: The kingdom is Yours, and You will reign in glory for all eternity. As it is written in Your Torah: "The Lord shall reign for ever and ever." And it is said: " And the Lord shall be King over all the earth: on that day the Lord shall be One, and His name One."
No nobler dream was ever dreamt. It is surely nobler to be a victim of the most noble dream than to profit from a sordid reality and to wallow in it. Dream is akin to aspiration. And aspiration is a kind of divination of an enigmatic vision. And an enigmatic vision in the emphatic sense is the perception of the ultimate mystery, of the truth of the ultimate mystery. The truth of the ultimate mystery — the truth that there is an ultimate mystery, that being is radically mysterious — cannot be denied even by the unbelieving Jew of our age. That unbelieving Jew of our age, if he has any education, is ordinarily a positivist, a believer in Science, if not a positivist without any education.

“It is excused by two facts: it does not know that it fiddles, and it does not know that Rome burns.”

Źródło: Liberalism Ancient and Modern (1968), p. 223
Kontekst: Only a great fool would call the new political science diabolic: it has no attributes peculiar to fallen angels. It is not even Machiavellian, for Machiavelli's teaching was graceful, subtle, and colorful. Nor is it Neronian. Nevertheless one may say of it that it fiddles while Rome burns. It is excused by two facts: it does not know that it fiddles, and it does not know that Rome burns.

“Philosophy has to grant that revelation is possible. But to grant that revelation is possible means to grant that philosophy is perhaps something infinitely unimportant.”

Źródło: Natural Right and History (1953), p. 75
Kontekst: Philosophy has to grant that revelation is possible. But to grant that revelation is possible means to grant that philosophy is perhaps something infinitely unimportant. To grant that revelation is possible means to grant that the philosophic life is not necessarily, not evidently, the right life. Philosophy, the life devoted to the quest for evident knowledge available to man as man, would itself rest on an unevident, arbitrary, or blind decision. This would merely confirm the thesis of faith, that there is no possibility of consistency, of a consistent and thoroughly sincere life, without belief in revelation. The mere fact that philosophy and revelation cannot refute each other would constitute the refutation of philosophy by revelation.

“All political action aims at either preservation or change.”

"What Is Political Philosophy" in The Journal of Politics, 19(3) (Aug. 1957) by the Southern Political Science Association, p. 343
Kontekst: All political action aims at either preservation or change. When desiring to preserve, we wish to prevent a change for the worse; when desiring to change, we wish to bring about something better. All political action is then guided by some thought of better or worse.

“Democracy, in a word, is meant to be an aristocracy which has broadened into a universal aristocracy.”

“What is liberal education,” pp. 4-5
Liberalism Ancient and Modern (1968)
Kontekst: It was once said that democracy is the regime that stands or falls by virtue: a democracy is a regime in which all or most adults are men of virtue, and since virtue seems to require wisdom, a regime in which all or most adults are virtuous and wise, or the society in which all or most adults have developed their reason to a high degree, or the rational society. Democracy, in a word, is meant to be an aristocracy which has broadened into a universal aristocracy. … There exists a whole science—the science which I among thousands of others profess to teach, political science—which so to speak has no other theme than the contrast between the original conception of democracy, or what one may call the ideal of democracy, and democracy as it is. … Liberal education is the ladder by which we try to ascend from mass democracy to democracy as originally meant.

“No nobler dream was ever dreamt. It is surely nobler to be a victim of the most noble dream than to profit from a sordid reality and to wallow in it.”

Commenting upon the Aleinu prayer, in "Why We Remain Jews" (1962)
Kontekst: The kingdom is Yours, and You will reign in glory for all eternity. As it is written in Your Torah: "The Lord shall reign for ever and ever." And it is said: " And the Lord shall be King over all the earth: on that day the Lord shall be One, and His name One."
No nobler dream was ever dreamt. It is surely nobler to be a victim of the most noble dream than to profit from a sordid reality and to wallow in it. Dream is akin to aspiration. And aspiration is a kind of divination of an enigmatic vision. And an enigmatic vision in the emphatic sense is the perception of the ultimate mystery, of the truth of the ultimate mystery. The truth of the ultimate mystery — the truth that there is an ultimate mystery, that being is radically mysterious — cannot be denied even by the unbelieving Jew of our age. That unbelieving Jew of our age, if he has any education, is ordinarily a positivist, a believer in Science, if not a positivist without any education.

“Men are constantly attracted and deluded by two opposite charms: the charm of competence which is engendered by mathematics and everything akin to mathematics, and the charm of humble awe, which is engendered by meditation on the human soul and its experiences. Philosophy is characterized by the gentle, if firm, refusal to succumb to either charm.”

Źródło: What is Political Philosophy (1959), p. 40
Kontekst: Men are constantly attracted and deluded by two opposite charms: the charm of competence which is engendered by mathematics and everything akin to mathematics, and the charm of humble awe, which is engendered by meditation on the human soul and its experiences. Philosophy is characterized by the gentle, if firm, refusal to succumb to either charm. It is the highest form of the mating of courage and moderation. In spite of its highness or nobility, it could appear as Sisyphean or ugly, when one contrasts its achievement with its goal. Yet it is necessarily accompanied, sustained and elevated by eros. It is graced by nature's grace.

“It is safer to try to understand the low in the light of the high than the high in the light of the low.”

Źródło: Liberalism Ancient and Modern (1968), p. 225
Kontekst: It is safer to try to understand the low in the light of the high than the high in the light of the low. In doing the latter one necessarily distorts the high, whereas in doing the former one does not deprive the low of the freedom to reveal itself as fully as what it is.

“Only a great fool would call the new political science diabolic: it has no attributes peculiar to fallen angels. It is not even Machiavellian, for Machiavelli's teaching was graceful, subtle, and colorful.”

Źródło: Liberalism Ancient and Modern (1968), p. 223
Kontekst: Only a great fool would call the new political science diabolic: it has no attributes peculiar to fallen angels. It is not even Machiavellian, for Machiavelli's teaching was graceful, subtle, and colorful. Nor is it Neronian. Nevertheless one may say of it that it fiddles while Rome burns. It is excused by two facts: it does not know that it fiddles, and it does not know that Rome burns.

“Liberal education is the necessary endeavor to found an aristocracy within democratic mass society.”

“What is liberal education,” p. 5
Liberalism Ancient and Modern (1968)

“The purpose of Plato, or of Aristotle, as Fārābī conceived of it, is sufficiently revealed in this seemingly conventional praise of philosophy.”

Leo Strauss książka Persecution and the Art of Writing

Persecution and the Art of Writing (1952), Introduction

“All there is to thinking is seeing something noticeable, which makes you see something you weren't noticing, which makes you see something that isn't even visible.”

Attributed to Strauss at many sites on the internet, this is actually Norman Maclean, in A River Runs Through It (1976)
Misattributed

Podobni autorzy

Erich Fromm Fotografia
Erich Fromm 66
amerykański filozof, psycholog i psychoanalityk
Martin Heidegger Fotografia
Martin Heidegger 20
filozof niemiecki
Hannah Arendt Fotografia
Hannah Arendt 16
amerykańska teoretyk polityki, filozof i publicystka
Edith Stein Fotografia
Edith Stein 16
zakonnica niemiecka, filozof, święta Kościoła katolickiego
Albert Schweitzer Fotografia
Albert Schweitzer 22
niemiecki teolog luterański, noblista w dziedzinie pokoju
Erwin Rommel Fotografia
Erwin Rommel 14
niemiecki generał
Ayn Rand Fotografia
Ayn Rand 57
amerykańska pisarka pochodzenia rosyjskiego, filozof
Thomas Mann Fotografia
Thomas Mann 57
prozaik niemiecki, noblista
Ernst Jünger Fotografia
Ernst Jünger 54
pisarz niemiecki
Róża Luksemburg Fotografia
Róża Luksemburg 24
niemiecka polityk