Isaiah Berlin cytaty

Isaiah Berlin – brytyjski historyk idei i filozof, pochodzący z rodziny rosyjskich Żydów; zwolennik liberalizmu, autor eseju Dwie koncepcje wolności , przez niektórych uważanego za najbardziej wpływowy szkic z zakresu współczesnej filozofii politycznej. Wikipedia  

✵ 6. Czerwiec 1909 – 5. Listopad 1997   •   Natępne imiona Sir Isaiah Berlin
Isaiah Berlin Fotografia
Isaiah Berlin: 34   Cytaty 0   Polubień

Isaiah Berlin słynne cytaty

„Marks przygotował atak na społeczeństwo burżuazyjne w chwili, w której osiągnęło ono szczytowy punkt swego rozkwitu materialnego. W tym samym roku Gladstone w mowie budżetowej pogratulował swym rodakom ich „zaraźliwego pomnażania bogactwa i potęgi”, którego świadkiem były poprzednie lata, upływające w nastroju rosnącego optymizmu i powszechnego zaufania. W tym świecie Marks jest postacią odizolowaną, zgorzkniałym wrogiem, gotowym na wzór wczesnych chrześcijan czy francuskich enragè (wściekłych) odrzucić wszystko, czym ten świat jest i do czego dąży, nazywając jego ideały bezwartościowymi, a jego cnoty grzechami, potępiając jego instytucje tylko za to, że są burżuazyjne, a więc należą do skorumpowanego, tyrańskiego i irracjonalnego społeczeństwa, które musi być unicestwione raz na zawsze. W epoce, która niszczyła swoich wrogów środkami potężnymi, choć działającymi wolno i dyskretnie, zmuszając Carlyle'a i Schopenhauera do ucieczki w odległe cywilizacje lub idealizowaną przeszłość, doprowadzając swego arcywroga Nietzschego do histerii i szaleństwa, Marks pozostał odporny i niezmiennie groźny. Jak starożytny prorok, dopełniający dzieła wyznaczonego mu przez niebiosa, z wewnętrznym spokojem opartym na jasnej i niewzruszonej wierze w harmonijne społeczeństwo przyszłości, objawiał wszystkim znaki rozkładu i ruiny, które widział na każdym kroku. Zdawało mu się, że stary ład wali się powoli przed jego oczami. Zdziałał więcej, niż ktokolwiek dla przyśpieszenia tego procesu, chcąc skrócić finalną agonię poprzedzającą koniec.”

Źródło: Karol Marks. Jego życie i środowisko

„Bo wolność nie jest po prostu brakiem jakichkolwiek ograniczeń”

Źródło: Cztery eseje o wolności

Isaiah Berlin: Cytaty po angielsku

“Single-minded monists, ruthless fanatics, men possessed by an all-embracing coherent vision do not know the doubts and agonies of those who cannot wholly blind themselves to reality.”

Five Essays on Liberty (2002), Introduction (1969)
Kontekst: Those, no doubt, are in some way fortunate who have brought themselves, or have been brought by others, to obey some ultimate principle before the bar of which all problems can be brought. Single-minded monists, ruthless fanatics, men possessed by an all-embracing coherent vision do not know the doubts and agonies of those who cannot wholly blind themselves to reality.

“This gives its value to freedom as Acton conceived of it — as an end in itself, and not as a temporary need, arising out of our confused notions and irrational and disordered lives, a predicament which a panacea could one day put right.”

Five Essays on Liberty (2002), Two Concepts of Liberty (1958)
Kontekst: If, as I believe, the ends of men are many, and not all of them are in principle compatible with each other, then the possibility of conflict — and of tragedy — can never wholly be eliminated from human life, either personal or social. The necessity of choosing between absolute claims is then an inescapable characteristic of the human condition. This gives its value to freedom as Acton conceived of it — as an end in itself, and not as a temporary need, arising out of our confused notions and irrational and disordered lives, a predicament which a panacea could one day put right.

“Everyone knows what made Berkeley notorious. He said that there were no material objects.”

Berkeley’s External World (1947)
Kontekst: Everyone knows what made Berkeley notorious. He said that there were no material objects. He said the external world was in some sense immaterial, that nothing existed save ideas — ideas and their authors. His contemporaries thought him very ingenious and a little mad.

“If our powers of prediction, and so our knowledge of the future, become much greater, then, even if they are never complete, this may radically alter our view of what constitutes a person, an act, a choice; and eo ipso our language and our picture of the world.”

Five Essays on Liberty (2002), From Hope and Fear Set Free (1964)
Kontekst: Knowledge increases autonomy both in the sense of Kant, and in that of Spinoza and his followers. I should like to ask once more: is all liberty just that? The advance of knowledge stops men from wasting their resources upon delusive projects. It has stopped us from burning witches or flogging lunatics or predicting the future by listening to oracles or looking at the entrails of animals or the flight of birds. It may yet render many institutions and decisions of the present – legal, political, moral, social – obsolete, by showing them to be as cruel and stupid and incompatible with the pursuit of justice or reason or happiness or truth as we now think the burning of widows or eating the flesh of an enemy to acquire skills. If our powers of prediction, and so our knowledge of the future, become much greater, then, even if they are never complete, this may radically alter our view of what constitutes a person, an act, a choice; and eo ipso our language and our picture of the world. This may make our conduct more rational, perhaps more tolerant, charitable, civilised, it may improve it in many ways, but will it increase the area of free choice? For individuals or groups?

“If I am prevented by others from doing what I could otherwise do, I am to that degree unfree; and if this area is contracted by other men beyond a certain minimum, I can be described as being coerced, or, it may be, enslaved.”

Five Essays on Liberty (2002), Two Concepts of Liberty (1958)
Kontekst: I am normally said to be free to the degree to which no man or body of men interferes with my activity. Political liberty in this sense is simply the area within which a man can act unobstructed by others. If I am prevented by others from doing what I could otherwise do, I am to that degree unfree; and if this area is contracted by other men beyond a certain minimum, I can be described as being coerced, or, it may be, enslaved. Coercion is not, however, a term that covers every form of inability. If I say that I am unable to jump more than ten feet in the air, or cannot read because I am blind, or cannot understand the darker pages of Hegel, it would be eccentric to say that I am to that degree enslaved or coerced. Coercion implies the deliberate interference of other human beings within the area in which I could otherwise act.

“Knowledge increases autonomy both in the sense of Kant, and in that of Spinoza and his followers.”

Five Essays on Liberty (2002), From Hope and Fear Set Free (1964)
Kontekst: Knowledge increases autonomy both in the sense of Kant, and in that of Spinoza and his followers. I should like to ask once more: is all liberty just that? The advance of knowledge stops men from wasting their resources upon delusive projects. It has stopped us from burning witches or flogging lunatics or predicting the future by listening to oracles or looking at the entrails of animals or the flight of birds. It may yet render many institutions and decisions of the present – legal, political, moral, social – obsolete, by showing them to be as cruel and stupid and incompatible with the pursuit of justice or reason or happiness or truth as we now think the burning of widows or eating the flesh of an enemy to acquire skills. If our powers of prediction, and so our knowledge of the future, become much greater, then, even if they are never complete, this may radically alter our view of what constitutes a person, an act, a choice; and eo ipso our language and our picture of the world. This may make our conduct more rational, perhaps more tolerant, charitable, civilised, it may improve it in many ways, but will it increase the area of free choice? For individuals or groups?

“If, as I believe, the ends of men are many, and not all of them are in principle compatible with each other, then the possibility of conflict — and of tragedy — can never wholly be eliminated from human life, either personal or social.”

Five Essays on Liberty (2002), Two Concepts of Liberty (1958)
Kontekst: If, as I believe, the ends of men are many, and not all of them are in principle compatible with each other, then the possibility of conflict — and of tragedy — can never wholly be eliminated from human life, either personal or social. The necessity of choosing between absolute claims is then an inescapable characteristic of the human condition. This gives its value to freedom as Acton conceived of it — as an end in itself, and not as a temporary need, arising out of our confused notions and irrational and disordered lives, a predicament which a panacea could one day put right.

“Few new truths have ever won their way against the resistance of established ideas save by being overstated.”

As quoted in Communications and History : Theories of Knowledge, Media and Civilization (1988) by Paul Heyer, p. 125

Podobni autorzy

Ayn Rand Fotografia
Ayn Rand 57
amerykańska pisarka pochodzenia rosyjskiego, filozof
Erich Fromm Fotografia
Erich Fromm 66
amerykański filozof, psycholog i psychoanalityk
Borys Pasternak Fotografia
Borys Pasternak 71
rosyjski poeta i prozaik
Włodzimierz Majakowski Fotografia
Włodzimierz Majakowski 17
poeta rosyjski
Edith Stein Fotografia
Edith Stein 16
zakonnica niemiecka, filozof, święta Kościoła katolickiego
Ilja Erenburg Fotografia
Ilja Erenburg 19
rosyjski pisarz
Maksim Gorki Fotografia
Maksim Gorki 17
pisarz rosyjski
Michaił Bułhakow Fotografia
Michaił Bułhakow 77
pisarz rosyjski
Isaac Asimov Fotografia
Isaac Asimov 19
amerykański pisarz
Emil Cioran Fotografia
Emil Cioran 73
pisarz pochodzenia rumuńskiego