Idézetek működés-ről
Idézetek gyűjteménye a működés, tudomány témáról .
Idézetek működés-ről
Richard Dawkins (1941) brit etológus, evolúciós biológus és népszerű tudományos író
Tudomány, illúziók és csodák
Eötvös József (1813–1871) magyar jogász, író, az MTA tagja és elnöke, országgyűlési képviselő
S ha a természettudományok haladásokat azon rendszernek köszönik, melyet, mert elménk természetéből fejlődik, nem egyes ember talált fel, de melyet Bacon nevével összekötünk, úgy ezen rendszer azt, hogy a tudományok körében általjánossá válik, éppen a természettudományok haladásának, s azon általjános érdeknek fogja köszönni, mellyel e tudományok napjainkban míveltetnek.
Eliezer Yudkowsky (1979)
Eredeti: Declaring yourself to be operating by " Crocker's Rules http://sl4.org/crocker.html" means that other people are allowed to optimize their messages for information, not for being nice to you. Crocker's Rules means that you have accepted full responsibility for the operation of your own mind - if you're offended, it's your fault.
Eliezer Yudkowsky (1979)
In every generation it is the same plea: "No, this time it really *is* too mysterious for science."
The children grow up in a world where stars and chemistry and life have always been mundane and previous generations were just being silly mystics. And when they encounter something that's *really* inexplicable, like consciousness, why, such a mystery has never happened before, it is wholly unlike such non-mysterious things as stars and life forms. Surely if there were a mundane explanation we would have found it already. As if stars and life forms had not been great mysteries for millennia on end, until one day someone solved them, and then they were not mysteries any more.
Eredeti: In every generation it is the same plea: "No, this time it really *is* too mysterious for science." The children grow up in a world where stars and chemistry and life have always been mundane and previous generations were just being silly mystics. And when they encounter something that's *really* inexplicable, like consciousness, why, such a mystery has never happened before, it is wholly unlike such non-mysterious things as stars and life forms. Surely if there were a mundane explanation we would have found it already. As if stars and life forms had not been great mysteries for millennia on end, until one day someone solved them, and then they were not mysteries any more.