
“It's a mere moment in a man's life between the All-Star Game and an old timer's game.”
During the 1980 Major League Baseball All-Star Game held at Dodger Stadium
The Unbearable Lightness of Being (1984), Part Two: Soul and Body, p. 59
“It's a mere moment in a man's life between the All-Star Game and an old timer's game.”
During the 1980 Major League Baseball All-Star Game held at Dodger Stadium
Source: Growing Up Absurd (1956), p. 42.
Source: 1960s, "The Use and Misuse of Game Theory," 1962, p. 108
Alternating Current (1967)
"Non-cooperative Games" in Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 54, No. 2 (September 1951); as cited in Can and should the Nash program be looked at as a part of mechanism theory? (2003) by Walter Trockel
1950s
Context: A less obvious type of application (of non-cooperative games) is to the study of. By a cooperative game we mean a situation involving a set of players, pure strategies, and payoffs as usual; but with the assumption that the players can and will collaborate as they do in the von Neumann and Morgenstern theory. This means the players may communicate and form coalitions which will be enforced by an umpire. It is unnecessarily restrictive, however, to assume any transferability or even comparability of the pay-offs [which should be in utility units] to different players. Any desired transferability can be put into the game itself instead of assuming it possible in the extra-game collaboration.
“The game itself is bigger than the winning.”
“Game II,” p. 97
The Sun Watches the Sun (1999), Sequence: “A Game”
"Non-cooperative Games" in Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 54, No. 2 (September 1951)<!-- ; as cited in Can and should the Nash program be looked at as a part of mechanism theory? (2003) by Walter Trockel -->
1950s
Context: The writer has developed a “dynamical” approach to the study of cooperative games based upon reduction to non-cooperative form. One proceeds by constructing a model of the preplay negotiation so that the steps of negotiation become moves in a larger non-cooperative game [which will have an infinity of pure strategies] describing the total situation. This larger game is then treated in terms of the theory of this paper [extended to infinite games] and if values are obtained they are taken as the values of the cooperative game. Thus the problem of analyzing a cooperative game becomes the problem of obtaining a suitable, and convincing, non-cooperative model for the negotiation.
The writer has, by such a treatment, obtained values for all finite two-person cooperative games, and some special n-person games.
Scientology : The Fundamentals of Thought (1973).
Scientology Bulletins