Mark Haddon book The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
Source: El curioso incidente del perro a medianoche
At the November 2002 Cape Canaveral premiere of the IMAX version of Apollo 13.
Associated Press: Hoaxers vs. Rocket Scientists: Even NASA unsure how to counter claims of faked moon landings, December 21, 2002.
2002
Mark Haddon book The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
Source: El curioso incidente del perro a medianoche
“You can never say the wrong thing.”
Chuck Palahniuk book Haunted
Variant: You can never set off to do the wrong thing.
Source: Haunted (2005), Chapter 4
Context: "It's not a matter of right and wrong," Mr. Whittier would say. Really, there is no wrong. Not in our minds. Our own reality. You can never set off to do the wrong thing. You can never say the wrong thing. In your own mind, you are always right. Every action you take--what you do or say or how you choose to appear--is automatically right the moment you act.
“Can you keep secrets? Can you know a thing and never say it again?”
Dan Brown book The Da Vinci Code
Source: The Da Vinci Code
Donald J. Trump (1946) 45th President of the United States of America
Response to a question regarding Michael Wolff's Fire and Fury, Camp David speech https://factba.se/transcript/donald-trump-remarks-questions-camp-david-gop-retreat-january-6-2018 (6 January 2018) <br class="br">2010s, 2018, January
Nelson Mandela (1918–2013) President of South Africa, anti-apartheid activist
Interview segment http://www.radiodiaries.org/mandela/t_movement.html on All Things Considered (NPR) broadcast (27 April 2004) <br class="br">2000s
Meat Loaf (1947) American musician, singer, songwriter, record producer and actor
A chat with Meat Loaf (2006)
Erwin Schrödinger (1887–1961) Austrian physicist
"The Fundamental Idea of Wave Mechanics", Nobel lecture, (12 December 1933)
Context: Conditions are admittedly such that we can always manage to make do in each concrete individual case without the two different aspects leading to different expectations as to the result of certain experiments. We cannot, however, manage to make do with such old, familiar, and seemingly indispensable terms as "real" or "only possible"; we are never in a position to say what really is or what really happens, but we can only say what will be observed in any concrete individual case. Will we have to be permanently satisfied with this...? On principle, yes. On principle, there is nothing new in the postulate that in the end exact science should aim at nothing more than the description of what can really be observed. The question is only whether from now on we shall have to refrain from tying description to a clear hypothesis about the real nature of the world. There are many who wish to pronounce such abdication even today. But I believe that this means making things a little too easy for oneself.