D.M. Turner (1962–1996) American drug researcher
Interview with Elizabeth Gips http://www.tripzine.com/articles.asp?id=dmturnergips
Interview with Elizabeth Gips http://www.tripzine.com/articles.asp?id=dmturnergips
D.M. Turner (1962–1996) American drug researcher
Interview with Elizabeth Gips http://www.tripzine.com/articles.asp?id=dmturnergips
Stanislav Grof (1931) Czech pychiatrist
The Cosmic Game - Explorations of the Frontiers of Human Consciousness (1997), ISBN 0-7914-3876-7, p. 260.
Stanislav Grof (1931) Czech pychiatrist
LSD psychotherapy (1980), MAPS 2001 edition, Epilogue, p. 299.
H. Richard Niebuhr (1894–1962) American theologian
Source: Radical Monotheism and Western Culture (1960), p. 12
Frank Gehry (1929) Canadian-American (b.1929)
Source: Jeremy Gilbert-Rolfe, Frank Gehry, The City and Music (2002)
Diederik Aerts (1953) Belgian theoretical physicist
Aerts, D. (1998). " The entity and modern physics: the creation-discovery view of reality. http://www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/aerts/publications/1998EntModPhys.pdf" In E. Castellani (Ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics (pp. 223-257). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rayssa Leal (2008) Youngest Brazilian skateboarder and athlete to win a medal at the Olympics
Rayssa Leal. Mateus Baeta: Conto de fadas à brasileira: Rayssa Leal é prata no skate street http://rededoesporte.gov.br/pt-br/noticias/conto-de-fadas-a-brasileira-rayssa-leal-conquista-prata-no-skate-street, Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Brazil https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/deed.en.
Richard Feynman (1918–1988) American theoretical physicist
The Value of Science (1955)
Context: The scientist has a lot of experience with ignorance and doubt and uncertainty, and this experience is of very great importance, I think. When a scientist doesn’t know the answer to a problem, he is ignorant. When he has a hunch as to what the result is, he is uncertain. And when he is pretty darn sure of what the result is going to be, he is still in some doubt. We have found it of paramount importance that in order to progress we must recognize our ignorance and leave room for doubt. Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees of certainty — some most unsure, some nearly sure, but none absolutely certain. Now, we scientists are used to this, and we take it for granted that it is perfectly consistent to be unsure, that it is possible to live and not know. But I don’t know whether everyone realizes this is true. Our freedom to doubt was born out of a struggle against authority in the early days of science. It was a very deep and strong struggle: permit us to question — to doubt — to not be sure. I think that it is important that we do not forget this struggle and thus perhaps lose what we have gained.