“Kuhn acknowledges having used the term "paradigm" in two different meanings. In the first one, "paradigm" designates what the members of a certain scientific community have in common, that is to say, the whole of techniques, patents and values shared by the members of the community. In the second sense, the paradigm is a single element of a whole, say for instance Newton’s Principia, which, acting as a common model or an example… stands for the explicit rules and thus defines a coherent tradition of investigation. Thus the question is for Kuhn to investigate by means of the paradigm what makes possible the constitution of what he calls "normal science". That is to say, the science which can decide if a certain problem will be considered scientific or not. Normal science does not mean at all a science guided by a coherent system of rules, on the contrary, the rules can be derived from the paradigms, but the paradigms can guide the investigation also in the absence of rules. This is precisely the second meaning of the term "paradigm", which Kuhn considered the most new and profound, though it is in truth the oldest.”

Michel Henry, Material Phenomenology, Fordham University Press, 2008, p. 118-119
Books on Phenomenology and Life, Material Phenomenology (1990)

Uncommon Wisdom (1988)

Librarians and Information Systems (1995)

Source: Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1901-1972) (1989), p. 2, footnote 4.

Source: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), VII. Crisis and the Emergence of Scientific Theories, p. 91 (2012 ed.)

Source: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), V. The Priority of Paradigms, p. 46

Source: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), Preface, p. xiii (2012 ed.)

Preface.
Advances in Enterprise Engineering II (2009)

Source: How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design (1995), p. 2