“We may become the makers of our fate when we have ceased to pose as its prophets.”

— Karl Popper , book The Open Society and Its Enemies

Introduction
The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945)

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "We may become the makers of our fate when we have ceased to pose as its prophets." by Karl Popper?

Karl Popper 82

Austrian-British philosopher of science 1902–1994

Related quotes

“We reap what we sow. We are the makers of our own fate. None else has the blame, none has the praise.”

Swami Vivekananda (1863–1902) Indian Hindu monk and phylosopher

Pearls of Wisdom

“We are here, not because we are law-breakers; we are here in our efforts to become law-makers.”

Emmeline Pankhurst book My Own Story

My Own Story (1914), p. 129, Hearst's International Library.

“What we may do
To-morrow may perhaps decide our fate.
We may have said but yesterday some word
Which may not be recalled.”

Letitia Elizabeth Landon (1802–1838) English poet and novelist

Corinne’s Chant in the Vicinity of Naples
Translations, From the French

“Whatever our fate is or may be, we have made it and do not complain of it."

- Vronksy {Anna Karenina}”

Leo Tolstoy book Anna Karenina

Source: Anna Karenina

“The problem is not the harshness of Fate, for anything we want strongly enough we get. The trouble is rather that when we have it we grow sick of it, and then we should never blame Fate, only our own desire.”

Cesare Pavese (1908–1950) Italian poet, novelist, literary critic, and translator

This Business of Living (1935-1950)

“No, we have not destroyed it. Let it sit. We cannot change its fate.”

Vasily Grossman (1905–1964) Soviet writer and journalist who originally trained as an engineer

1960s

“When law was held to come direct from the gods, it required a bold man and a prophet to propose a change in it. Perhaps it is still true that a law-maker ought to be something of a prophet. But if so, we are committed in western lands to the belief that prophetic capacity is widespread: the making of law goes on everywhere merrily and apace.”

William Ernest Hocking (1873–1966) American philosopher

Source: Present Status of the Philosophy of Law and of Rights (1926), Ch. I : What is Behind Us?, p. 1.
Context: When law was held to come direct from the gods, it required a bold man and a prophet to propose a change in it. Perhaps it is still true that a law-maker ought to be something of a prophet. But if so, we are committed in western lands to the belief that prophetic capacity is widespread: the making of law goes on everywhere merrily and apace.
In the midst of this vast labor it becomes clear to us that the more we relieve the gods of their burdens, the more we need to know what the gods know, the general principles on which law should be made. And if this knowledge were universal, and were applied in good faith, the law-makers themselves would in turn be relieved! In either case, then, we are bound to keep trying for a systematic grasp of those principles of law which we now possess in vague and fragmentary fashion.