“b>Interviewer: Have you ever attended a mime school?
Brian: Nop. Never. I used to watch a lot of cartoons and the Muppets Show and that's why I make the funny faces. So it was all cartoon and Jim Henson.”

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "b>Interviewer: Have you ever attended a mime school? Brian: Nop. Never. I used to watch a lot of cartoons and the Mupp…" by Brian Viglione?
Brian Viglione photo
Brian Viglione 11
American musician 1979

Related quotes

Pendleton Ward photo
John Kricfalusi photo
Bill Clinton photo
Paul Simon photo

“I want a shot at redemption
Don’t want to end up a cartoon
In a cartoon graveyard.”

Paul Simon (1941) American musician, songwriter and producer

You Can Call Me Al
Song lyrics, Graceland (1986)
Context: A man walks down the street
He says why am I soft in the middle now
Why am I soft in the middle
The rest of my life is so hard
I need a photo opportunity
I want a shot at redemption
Don’t want to end up a cartoon
In a cartoon graveyard.

Salman Rushdie photo
Jeff Lindsay photo
Frank Miller photo
Stephen Hawking photo

“I like physics, but I love cartoons.”

Stephen Hawking (1942–2018) British theoretical physicist, cosmologist, and author
Benoît Mandelbrot photo

“I think it's very important to have both cartoons and more realistic structures. The cartoons have the power of representing the essential very often, but have this intrinsic weakness of being in a certain sense predictable.”

Benoît Mandelbrot (1924–2010) Polish-born, French and American mathematician

Segment 70
Peoples Archive interview
Context: I think it's very important to have both cartoons and more realistic structures. The cartoons have the power of representing the essential very often, but have this intrinsic weakness of being in a certain sense predictable. Once you look at the Sierpinski triangle for a very long time you see more consequences of the construction, but they are rather short consequences, they don't require a very long sequence of thinking. In a certain sense, the most surprising, the richest sciences are those in which we start from simple rules and then go on to very, very long trains of consequences and very long trains of consequences, which you are still predicting correctly.

Related topics