La Route de la servitude (The Road to Serfdom), 1943
Œuvres
La Constitution de la liberté
Friedrich HayekLa Route de la servitude
Friedrich HayekDroit, législation et liberté
Friedrich Hayek
Friedrich Hayek:
103
citations
2
J'aime
Friedrich Hayek citations célèbres
La Route de la servitude ('), 1943
Well, I would say that, as long-term institutions, I am totally against dictatorships. But a dictatorship may be a necessary system for a transitional period. At times it is necessary for a country to have, for a time, some form or other of dictatorial power. […] Personally I prefer a liberal dictator to democratic government lacking liberalism. My personal impression […] is that in Chile, for example, we will witness a transition from a dictatorial government to a liberal government.
en
Autre
La Route de la servitude (The Road to Serfdom), 1943
La Route de la servitude ('), 1943
Friedrich Hayek Citations
La Constitution de la liberté ('), 1960
La Constitution de la liberté ('), 1960
La Constitution de la liberté ('), 1960
Droit, législation et liberté ('), 1973-1979
La Constitution de la liberté (The Constitution of Liberty), 1960
La Constitution de la liberté ('), 1960
La Route de la servitude ('), 1943
La Route de la servitude (The Road to Serfdom), 1943
“Ce n'est pas la source mais la limitation du pouvoir qui l'empêche d'être arbitraire.”
La Route de la servitude ('), 1943
La Route de la servitude ('), 1943
Droit, législation et liberté ('), 1973-1979
Essais de philosophie, de science politique et d'économie, 1967
La Constitution de la liberté ('), 1960
Friedrich Hayek: Citations en anglais
Friedrich Hayek
livre
The Fatal Conceit
Source: 1980s and later, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism (1988), Ch. 5: The Fatal Conceit.
Contexte: Whereas, in fact, specialised students, even after generations of effort, find it exceedingly difficult to explain such matters, and cannot agree on what are the causes or what will be the effects of particular events. The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.
"The Origins and Effects of Our Morals: A Problem for Science", in The Essence of Hayek (1984)
1980s and later
“The more the state "plans" the more difficult planning becomes for the individual.”
Source: 1940s–1950s, The Road to Serfdom (1944), Chapter 6: Planning and the Rule of Law
1980s and later, Interview in Silver & Gold Report (1980)
1980s and later, Knowledge, Evolution and Society (1983), "Coping with Ignorance", "Our Moral Heritage"
Exclusive Interview with F.A. Hayek by James U. Blanchard III, in Cato Policy Report (May/June 1984)
1980s and later
Interview in El Mercurio (1981)
1980s and later
Contexte: Well, I would say that, as long-term institutions, I am totally against dictatorships. But a dictatorship may be a necessary system for a transitional period. At times it is necessary for a country to have, for a time, some form or other of dictatorial power. As you will understand, it is possible for a dictator to govern in a liberal way. And it is also possible for a democracy to govern with a total lack of liberalism. Personally I prefer a liberal dictator to democratic government lacking liberalism. My personal impression — and this is valid for South America — is that in Chile, for example, we will witness a transition from a dictatorial government to a liberal government. And during this transition it may be necessary to maintain certain dictatorial powers, not as something permanent, but as a temporary arrangement.
Conversation at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. (9 February 1978); published in A Conversation with Friedrich A. Von Hayek: Science and Socialism (1979)
1960s–1970s
Contexte: I have arrived at the conviction that the neglect by economists to discuss seriously what is really the crucial problem of our time is due to a certain timidity about soiling their hands by going from purely scientific questions into value questions. This is a belief deliberately maintained by the other side because if they admitted that the issue is not a scientific question, they would have to admit that their science is antiquated and that, in academic circles, it occupies the position of astrology and not one that has any justification for serious consideration in scientific discussion. It seems to me that socialists today can preserve their position in academic economics merely by the pretense that the differences are entirely moral questions about which science cannot decide.
“Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.”
Friedrich Hayek
livre
The Fatal Conceit
Source: 1980s and later, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism (1988), Ch. 5: The Fatal Conceit.
Contexte: Whereas, in fact, specialised students, even after generations of effort, find it exceedingly difficult to explain such matters, and cannot agree on what are the causes or what will be the effects of particular events. The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.
"Conversation with Systematic Liberalism," Forum (September 1961). <!-- p. 6. ; also in Friedrich Hayek : A Biography (2003) by Alan O. Ebenstein-->
1960s–1970s
Contexte: nowiki>[Apartheid law in South Africa] appears to be a clear and even extreme instance of that discrimination between different individuals which seems to me to be incompatible with the reign of liberty. The essence of what I said [in The Constitution of Liberty] was really the fact that the laws under which government can use coercion are equal for all responsible adult members of that society. Any kind of discrimination — be it on grounds of religion, political opinion, race, or whatever it is — seems to be incompatible with the idea of freedom under the law. Experience has shown that separate never is equal and cannot be equal.
Letter to The Times after Thatcher claimed that British people were afraid of being "swamped" by people of a different culture. (11 February 1978), p. 15
1960s–1970s
December 13, 1991, quoted in Friedrich Hayek: A Biography (2001) by Alan O. Ebenstein
1980s and later
Source: 1960s–1970s, The Constitution of Liberty (1960), p. 79.
1975 interview https://mises.org/library/hayek-meets-press-1975 on "Meet the Press."
1960s–1970s
Lecture II. Liberalism and Administration: The Rechtsstaat - 7. Montesquieu, Rousseau, and the French Revolution
1940s–1950s, The Political Ideal of the Rule of Law (1955)
Lecture III. The Safeguards of Individual Liberty - 19. Fundamental Rights and the Protected Private Sphere
1940s–1950s, The Political Ideal of the Rule of Law (1955)
in 1985 interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11AXDT5824Y with John O'Sullivan
1980s and later
"Intertemporal Price Equilibrium and Movement in the Value of Money" (1928)
1920s–1930s
1980s and later, Knowledge, Evolution and Society (1983), "Coping with Ignorance"
Source: http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/coping-with-ignorance/
1980s and later, "Two Pages of Fiction" (1982)
1980s and later, Interview in Silver & Gold Report (1980)
Letter to The Times (3 August 1978), p. 15
1960s–1970s
1980s and later, Knowledge, Evolution and Society (1983), "Coping with Ignorance", "The Reactionary Nature of the Socialist Conception"
“Principles or Expediency?” Toward Liberty: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday (29 September 1971)
1960s–1970s
1980s and later, Interview in Silver & Gold Report (1980)
1960s–1970s, Nobel Banquet Speech (1974)
"Interview with F. A. Hayek", in Cato Policy Report (February 1983)
1980s and later
"The Origins and Effects of Our Morals: A Problem for Science", in The Essence of Hayek (1984)
1980s and later
Interview with Thomas W. Hazlett in May of 1977, as published in " The Road to Serfdom, Forseeing the Fall", in Reason magazine (July 1992) http://reason.com/archives/1992/07/01/the-road-from-serfdom
1960s–1970s
1980s and later, Interview in Silver & Gold Report (1980)
