Liberty vs Socialism
Context: There is no moral argument that justifies using the coercive powers of government to force one person to bear the expense of taking care of another. If that person is too resolute in his refusal to do so, what is the case for imposing fines, imprisonment or death? You say, "Death! Aren't you exaggerating, Williams?" Say he tells the agents of Congress that he'll pay his share of the constitutionally mandated functions of government but refuse to pay the health costs of a sick obese person or a cyclist who becomes a vegetable, what do you think the likely course of events will be? First, he'd be threatened with fines, imprisonment or property confiscation. Refusal to give in to these government sanctions would ultimately lead to his being shot by the agents of Congress.
Walter E. Williams: Use
Walter E. Williams is American economist, commentator, and academic. Explore interesting quotes on use.
The heck it isn't. The decision of who had the right to use most of the Earth's surface was settled through violence (wars). Who has the right to the income I earn is partially settled through the threats of violence. In fact, violence is such an effective means of resolving conflict that most governments want a monopoly on its use.
1970s, Economics for the Citizen (1978)
2010s, Markets, Governments, and the Common Good
That's a challenge I love: making economics fun and understandable.
1970s, Economics for the Citizen (1978)
2010s, Markets, Governments, and the Common Good
2010s, Markets, Governments, and the Common Good
1970s, Economics for the Citizen (1978)
1970s, Economics for the Citizen (1978)
1970s, Economics for the Citizen (1978)