319 U.S. 638
Judicial opinions, West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)
Context: The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.
Robert H. Jackson: Court
Robert H. Jackson was American judge. Explore interesting quotes on court.Judicial opinions, Korematsu v. United States (1944)
The Supreme Court in the American System of Government (1955), p. 30
Source: The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study in Crisis in American Power Politics (1941), P. vii
Douglas v. Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 181 (1943)
Judicial opinions
Advocacy Before the Supreme Court: Suggestions for Effective Case Presentations, 37 A.B.A Journal 801 (1951)
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952) (concurring)
Judicial opinions
Source: The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study in Crisis in American Power Politics (1941), P. 297
SEC v. Chenery Corporation, 332 U.S. 194, 213 (1947) (dissenting)
Judicial opinions
Craig v. Harney, 331 U. S. 367, 396 (1947)
Judicial opinions
Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 87 (1953)
Judicial opinions
Reported in Eugene Gerhart, America's Advocate: Robert H. Jackson (1958), p. 289
United States v. Public Utilities Commission, 345 U.S. 295, 319 (1953) (concurring)
Judicial opinions
Helvering v. Griffiths, 318 U.S. at 400-401 (1943).
Judicial opinions
Massachusetts v. United States, 333 U.S. 611, 639-40 (1948) (dissenting)
Judicial opinions
Describing the unsung heroes of legal practice. "Tribute to Country Lawyers: A Review", 30 A.B.A Journal 139 (1944)
The Supreme Court in the American System of Government (1955), p. 79