Pauline Kael: Movie

Pauline Kael was American film critic. Explore interesting quotes on movie.
Pauline Kael: 144   quotes 5   likes

“It's sometimes discouraging to see all of a director's movies, because there's so much repetition. The auteurists took this to be a sign of a director's artistry, that you could recognize his movies. But it can also be a sign that he's a hack.”

"The Perils of Being Pauline" http://wrt102summer2005.blogspot.com/2005/07/pauline-kael-new-yorker-interview.html, interview with Francis Davis, The New Yorker (October 2001).
Interviews

“If there is any test that can be applied to movies, it's that the good ones never make you feel virtuous.”

"Ersatz," review of Stand By Me (1986-09-08), p. 197.
Hooked (1989)

“What's disgusting about the Dirty Harry movies is that Eastwood plays this angry tension as righteous indignation.”

"Pop Mystics," review of Pale Rider (1985-08-12), p. 17.
Hooked (1989)

“At the movies, we are gradually being conditioned to accept violence as a sensual pleasure. The directors used to say they were showing us its real face and how ugly it was in order to sensitize us to its horrors. You don't have to be very keen to see that they are now in fact desensitizing us. They are saying that everyone is brutal, and the heroes must be as brutal as the villains or they turn into fools. There seems to be an assumption that if you're offended by movie brutality, you are somehow playing into the hands of the people who want censorship. But this would deny those of us who don't believe in censorship the use of the only counterbalance: the freedom of the press to say that there's anything conceivably damaging in these films — the freedom to analyze their implications. If we don't use this critical freedom, we are implicitly saying that no brutality is too much for us — that only squares and people who believe in censorship are concerned with brutality. Actually, those who believe in censorship are primarily concerned with sex, and they generally worry about violence only when it's eroticized. This means that practically no one raises the issue of the possible cumulative effects of movie brutality. Yet surely, when night after night atrocities are served up to us as entertainment, it's worth some anxiety. We become clockwork oranges if we accept all this pop culture without asking what's in it. How can people go on talking about the dazzling brilliance of movies and not notice that the directors are sucking up to the thugs in the audience?”

"Stanley Strangelove" (January 1972) http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/amk/doc/0051.html, review of A Clockwork Orange
Deeper into Movies (1973)