1. Quotes
  2. Authors
  3. Luther H. Gulick

Luther H. Gulick Quotes

Luther Halsey Gulick was an American political scientist, Eaton Professor of Municipal Science and Administration at Columbia University, and Director of its Institute of Public Administration, known as an expert on public administration. Wikipedia  

✵ 17. January 1892 – 10. January 1993
Luther H. Gulick photo
Luther H. Gulick: 13 quotes2 likes

Famous Luther H. Gulick Quotes

“Students of administration have long sought a single principle of effective departmentalization just as alchemists sought the philosophers' stone. But they have sought in vain. There is apparently no one most effective system of departmentalism.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Notes on the Theory of Organization," 1937, p. 31

“The efficiency of a group working together is directly related to the homogeneity of the work they are performing.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Notes on the Theory of Organization," 1937, p. 9-10

“Administration has to do with getting things done; with the accomplishment of defined objectives. The science of administration is thus the system of knowledge whereby men may understand relationships, predict results, and influence outcomes in any situation where men are organized at work together for a common purpose.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Science, values and public administration," 1937, p. 189; cited in: Marshall W. Meyer (1985), Limits to Bureaucratic Growth, p. 18

“[POSDCORB as]… statement of the work of a chief executive is adapted from the functional analysis elaborated by Henri Fayol in his "Industrial and General Administration." It is believed that those who know administration intimately will find in this analysis a valid and helpful pattern, into which can be fitted each of the major activities and duties of any chief executive.”

Luther H. Gulick

"Notes on the Theory of Organization," 1937

“The fundamental objective of the science of administration is the accomplishment of the work in hand with the least expenditure of man-power and materials. Efficiency is thus axiom number one in the value scale of administration. This brings administration into apparent conflict with certain elements of the value scale of politics, whether we use that term in its scientific or in its popular sense. But both public administration and politics are branches of political science, so that we are in the end compelled to mitigate the pure concept of efficiency in the light of the value scale of politics and the social order. There are, for example, highly inefficient arrangements like citizen boards and small local governments which may be necessary in a democracy as educational devices. It has been argued also that the spoils system, which destroys efficiency in administration, is needed to maintain the political party, that the political party is needed to maintain the structure of government, and that without the structure of government, administration itself will disappear. While this chain of causation has been disproved under certain conditions, it none the less illustrates the point that the principles of politics may seriously affect efficiency. Similarly in private business it is often true that the necessity for immediate profits growing from the system of private ownership may seriously interfere with the achievement of efficiency in practice.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Science, values and public administration," 1937, p. 192-193

“It may also be noted that the authoritarian states are in trouble internationally. Some regard this as intentional, as part of the diversion and scapegoat technique, while others think that it is more or less inevitable because of the very co-ordination of the economic activities of the individual nations in question.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Notes on the Theory of Organization," 1937, p. 40

Luther H. Gulick Quotes

“What is the work of the chief executive? What does he do?”

Luther H. Gulick

"Notes on the Theory of Organization," 1937

“At the present time administration is more an art than a science; in fact there are those who assert dogmatically that it can never be anything else. They draw no hope from the fact that metallurgy, for example, was completely an art several centuries before it became primarily a science and commenced its great forward strides after generations of intermittent advance and decline.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Science, values and public administration," 1937, p. 189; cited in: W. Bartley Hildreth et al. (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration, Second Edition,1997, p. 754

“A workman subject to orders from several superiors will be confused, inefficient, and irresponsible; a workman subject to orders from but one superior may be methodical, efficient, and responsible.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Notes on the Theory of Organization," 1937, p. 43

“The theory of organization… has to do with the structure of co-ordination imposed upon the work-division units of an enterprise.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Notes on the Theory of Organization," 1937, p. 3

“Public administration is that part of the science of administration which has to do with government, and thus concerns itself primarily with the executive branch, where the work of government is done, though there are obviously administrative problems also in connection with the legislative and the judicial branches. Public administration is thus a division of political science, and one of the social sciences.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Science, values and public administration," 1937, p. 189

“It is appropriate at the outset of this discussion to consider the reasons for and the effect of the division of work. It is sufficient for our purpose to note the following factors.
:Why Divide Work?
:* Because men differ in nature, capacity and skill, and gain greatly in dexterity by specialization;
:* Because the same man cannot be at two places at the same time;
:* Because one man cannot do two things at the same time;
:* Because the range of knowledge and skill is so great that a man cannot within his life-span know more than a small fraction of it. In other words, it is a question of human nature, time, and space.
In a shoe factory it would be possible to have 1,000 men each assigned to making complete pairs of shoes…”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Notes on the Theory of Organization," 1937, p. 3 ; on the division of work

“The power of an idea to serve as the foundation of co-ordination is so great that one may observe many examples of co-ordination even in the absence of any single leader or of any framework of authority.”

Luther H. Gulick

Source: "Notes on the Theory of Organization," 1937, p. 38

Similar authors

Ayn Rand photo
Ayn Rand322
Russian-American novelist and philosopher None
James Tobin photo
James Tobin22
American economist None
Charles Bukowski photo
Charles Bukowski555
American writer None
John Nash photo
John Nash23
American mathematician and Nobel Prize laureate None
Richard Dawkins photo
Richard Dawkins322
English ethologist, evolutionary biologist and author None
Paul A. Samuelson photo
Paul A. Samuelson47
American economist None
Reinhold Niebuhr photo
Reinhold Niebuhr65
American protestant theologian None
Friedrich Hayek photo
Friedrich Hayek79
Austrian and British economist and Nobel Prize for Economic… None
Noam Chomsky photo
Noam Chomsky334
american linguist, philosopher and activist None
Umberto Eco photo
Umberto Eco120
Italian semiotician, essayist, philosopher, literary critic… None