Birmingham and District Land Co. v. London and North-Western Railway Co. (1888), 57 L. J. Rep. (N. S.) C. D. 123.
Famous Arthur Kekewich Quotes
Davies v. Davies (1887), L. R. 36 C. D. 364; see also Egerton v. Earl Brownlow, 4 H. L. C. 1.
Young v. South African, &c. Syndicate (1896), L. R. 2 C. D. [1896], p. 278.
“Motives do not concern me; they are a dangerous subject with which to deal.”
Whelan v. Palmer (1888), L. J. Rep. (N. S.) 57 C. D. 788.
Evans v. Manchester, &c. Rail. Co. (1887), L. J. (N. S.) 57 C. D. 157.
In re De Nicols. De Nicols v. Curlieb (1898), L. R. 1 C. D. [1898], p. 410.
Arthur Kekewich Quotes about the decision
“I must look at the decision with reference to all the circumstances which led to it.”
In re England (1895), L. R. 2 C. D. [1895], p. 109.
“A decision of the House of Lords requires no sanction.”
In re Weall Andrews v. Weall (1889), L. R. 42 Ch. D. 679.
Arthur Kekewich Quotes
Lauri v. Renad (1892), L. R. 3 C. D. [1892], p. 413.
Ashworth v. Roberts (1890), L. J. Rep. (N. S.) 60 C. D. 28.
Horlock v. Wiggins (1888), L. R. 39 C. D. 143.
“I wish to uphold counsel in the exercise of their discretion.”
In re Somerset; Somerset v. Earl Poulett (1893), L. R. [1894], 1 Ch. 249.
Blank v. Footman & Co. (1888), 57 L. J. (N. S.) C. D. 914.
James v. Smith (1890), L. R. 1 C. D. [1891], p. 389.
“Masterly inactivity may be prudence to one man, desperate rashness to another.”
In re Liverpool Household Stores Assoc. (1890), 59 L. J. Rep. C. D. 618.
Woolf v. Woolf (1898), L. R. 1 C. D. 347.
Union Bank v. Munster (1887), L. R. 37 CD. 54.
In re Nottage (1895), L. R. 2 C. D. [1895], p. 653.