“Here is a story of latifundia and death squads, masters and slaves, patriarchs and subordinated women, self-enriching capitalists and plundered provinces, profiteering slumlords and urban rioters. Here is a struggle between the plutocratic few and the indigent many, the privileged versus the proletariat, featuring corrupt politicians, money-driven elections, and the political assassination of popular leaders. I leave it to the reader to decide whether any of this might resonate with the temper of our own times.” Michael Parenti book The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome Introduction The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome (2003)
“Caesar’s sin, I shall argue, was not that he was subverting the Roman constitution—which was an unwritten one—but that he was loosening the oligarchy’s overbearing grip on it. Worse still, he used state power to effect some limited benefits for small farmers, debtors, and urban proletariat, at the expense of the wealthy few.” Michael Parenti book The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome Introduction The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome (2003)
“Those who think Roman slavery was such a benign institution have not explained why fugitive slaves were a constant problem. Owners did not lightly countenance the loss of valuable property. They regularly used chains, metal collars, and other restraining devices. Slaves who fled were hunted down and returned to irate masters who were keen to inflict a severe retribution.” Michael Parenti book The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome Source: The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome (2003), Ch. 1