“You put too much stock in human intelligence, it doesn't annihilate human nature.”
Philip Roth book American Pastoral
Source: American Pastoral
"Humanity – not just a virus with shoes", Dark Optimism (2019) http://www.darkoptimism.org/2019/08/06/humanity-not-just-a-virus-with-shoes/#post-6037
“You put too much stock in human intelligence, it doesn't annihilate human nature.”
Philip Roth book American Pastoral
Source: American Pastoral
Margaret Mead (1901–1978) American anthropologist
Source: 1940s, And Keep Your Powder Dry: An Anthropologist Looks at America (1942), p. 134
Dan Flores (1948) American historian
The Natural West: Environmental History in the Great Plains and Rocky Mountains (2003)
Peter Singer (1946) Australian philosopher
Source: The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress (1981), Chapter 6, A New Understanding Of Ethics, p. 172
Camille Paglia (1947) American writer
Source: Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson (1990), p. 13
Olaf Stapledon (1886–1950) British novelist and philosopher
Other texts <br class="br">Source: The Great Certainty http://web.archive.org/web/20090723055942/http://olafstapledonarchive.webs.com/thegreatcertainty.html
“Where is human nature so weak as in a book store?”
Henry Ward Beecher (1813–1887) American clergyman and activist
"Subtleties of Book Buyers," Star Papers (1855)
Miscellany
Jonas Salk (1914–1995) Inventor of polio vaccine
Academy of Achievement interview (1991)
Context: Why do I see things differently from the way other people see them? Why do I pursue the questions that I pursue, even if others regard them as, as they say, "controversial?" Which merely means that they have a difference of opinion. They see things differently. I am interested both in nature, and in the human side of nature, and how the two can be brought together, and effectively used.