“Without a constant misuse of language, there cannot be any discovery, any progress.”
Paul Karl Feyerabend book Against Method
pg. 27.
Against Method (1975)
Source: Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge
Source: Looking Backward, 2000-1887 http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/25439 (1888), Ch. 6.
“Without a constant misuse of language, there cannot be any discovery, any progress.”
Paul Karl Feyerabend book Against Method
pg. 27.
Against Method (1975)
Source: Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge
Milton Friedman (1912–2006) American economist, statistician, and writer
“Interview with Milton Friedman”, Playboy magazine (Feb. 1973)
Janusz Korwin-Mikke (1942) polish politician
Polish: Nawet za Hitlera czy Stalina, góral mógł sobie robić oscypki, jakie chciał, a dzisiaj stoi nad nim urzędnik unijny. <br class="br">Source: Blog of the autor, 21 March 2009 http://korwin-mikke.blog.onet.pl/2009/03/21/w-wirtualnej-goscinie-u-kaszubow/
Thomas Gainsborough (1727–1788) English portrait and landscape painter
Quote in: Undated letters to Jackson, in The Letters of Thomas Gainsborough, ed. Mary Woodall, 1961
undated, Undated letters to William Jackson
Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882–1945) 32nd President of the United States
1930s, State of the Union Address (1935)
Context: We find our population suffering from old inequalities, little changed by vast sporadic remedies. In spite of our efforts and in spite of our talk, we have not weeded out the over privileged and we have not effectively lifted up the underprivileged. Both of these manifestations of injustice have retarded happiness. No wise man has any intention of destroying what is known as the profit motive; because by the profit motive we mean the right by work to earn a decent livelihood for ourselves and for our families.
We have, however, a clear mandate from the people, that Americans must forswear that conception of the acquisition of wealth which, through excessive profits, creates undue private power over private affairs and, to our misfortune, over public affairs as well. In building toward this end we do not destroy ambition, nor do we seek to divide our wealth into equal shares on stated occasions. We continue to recognize the greater ability of some to earn more than others. But we do assert that the ambition of the individual to obtain for him and his a proper security, a reasonable leisure, and a decent living throughout life, is an ambition to be preferred to the appetite for great wealth and great power.
Milton Friedman book Capitalism and Freedom
Source: Capitalism and Freedom (1962), Ch. 8 Monopoly and the Social Responsibility of Business and Labor, p. 133
James Madison (1751–1836) 4th president of the United States (1809 to 1817)
1810s, Letter to Robert J. Evans (1819)
Frank Herbert (1920–1986) American writer
General sources
Context: The thing we must do intensely is be human together. People are more important than things. We must get together. The best thing humans can have going for them is each other. We have each other. We must reject everything which humiliates us. Humans are not objects of consumption. We must develop an absolute priority of humans ahead of profit — any humans ahead of any profit. Then we will survive. … Together.
"Introduction" to New World or No World (1970)<!-- an anthology of environmental writing -->
Milton Friedman (1912–2006) American economist, statistician, and writer
As quoted in Conservatives Betrayed: How George W. Bush and other big government Republicans hijacked the conservative cause (2006) by Richard A Viguerie, p. 46 <!-- similar to statement previously dated (16 September 2003) — but linked page indicates "interview" by John Hawkins dated 25 February 2012 http://www.rightwingnews.com/interviews/friedman.php : I am in favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse, for any reason, whenever it's possible. … because I believe the big problem is not taxes, the big problem is spending. The question is, "How do you hold down government spending?" Government spending now amounts to close to 40% of national income not counting indirect spending through regulation and the like. If you include that, you get up to roughly half. The real danger we face is that number will creep up and up and up. The only effective way I think to hold it down, is to hold down the amount of income the government has. The way to do that is to cut taxes. --> <br class="br">Context: I am in favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse, for any reason, whenever it's possible. … because I believe the big problem is not taxes, the big problem is spending. I believe our government is too large and intrusive, that we do not get our money's worth for the roughly 40 percent of our income that is spent by government … How can we ever cut government down to size? I believe there is one and only one way: the way parents control spendthrift children, cutting their allowance. For government, that means cutting taxes.