Vitruvius book De architectura
Introduction, Sec. 14
De architectura (The Ten Books On Architecture) (~ 15BC), Book IX
The Elements of Morality, Book 1, ch. 1. (1845).
Vitruvius book De architectura
Introduction, Sec. 14
De architectura (The Ten Books On Architecture) (~ 15BC), Book IX
Charles Cooley (1864–1929) American sociologist
Charles Horton Cooley, in Structure and Agency in Everyday Life: An Introduction to Social Psychology http://books.google.co.in/books?id=KMLEnR1hoDQC&pg=PA53, (1 January 2003), p. 53
Augustus De Morgan (1806–1871) British mathematician, philosopher and university teacher (1806-1871)
Formal Logic (1847)
Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906–1945) German Lutheran pastor, theologian, dissident anti-Nazi
Source: Discipleship (1937), The Disciple and Unbelievers, p. 184.
Clive Staples Lewis book Mere Christianity
Book I, Chapter 4, "What Lies behind the Law"
Mere Christianity (1952)
Denis Diderot (1713–1784) French Enlightenment philosopher and encyclopædist
No. 15
On the Interpretation of Nature (1753)
Context: There are three principal means of acquiring knowledge available to us: observation of nature, reflection, and experimentation. Observation collects facts; reflection combines them; experimentation verifies the result of that combination. Our observation of nature must be diligent, our reflection profound, and our experiments exact. We rarely see these three means combined; and for this reason, creative geniuses are not common.
Oscar Levy (1867–1946) German physician and writer
Source: The Revival of Aristocracy (1906), pp. 86-97.
David D. Levine (1961) science fiction writer
Source: Arabella and the Battle of Venus (2017), Chapter 3, “Seeking Passage” (p. 46)
John Theophilus Desaguliers (1683–1744) French-born British natural philosopher and clergyman
Source: Course of Experimental Philosophy, 1745, p. v: Preface
Context: All the knowledge we have of nature depends upon facts; for without observations and experiments our natural philosophy would only be a science of terms and an unintelligible jargon. But then we must call in Geometry and Arithmetics, to our Assistance, unless we are willing to content ourselves with natural History and conjectural Philosophy. For, as many causes concur in the production of compound effects, we are liable to mistake the predominant cause, unless we can measure the quantity and the effect produced, compare them with, and distinguish them from, each other, to find out the adequate cause of each single effect, and what must be the result of their joint action.