“Been reading Hardy's Return of the Native. Astonishing how moral standards have shifted over the past hundred years:shifted isn't the word - a landslide… Today the problems of these nineteenth-century novels strike us as exaggerated, as bathos, even comical - much ado about nothing. But for these people it really was a struggle with the gods, very real, menacing, dangerous gods.”

Broken Lights Diaries 1955-57.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Been reading Hardy's Return of the Native. Astonishing how moral standards have shifted over the past hundred years:shi…" by Ida Friederike Görres?
Ida Friederike Görres photo
Ida Friederike Görres 57
Austrian writer and noble 1901–1971

Related quotes

Anthony Trollope photo

“No man thinks there is much ado about nothing when the ado is about himself.”

Anthony Trollope (1815–1882) English novelist (1815-1882)

The Bertrams (1859), Ch. 27

Steven Curtis Chapman photo

“The influence of Meister Eckhart is stronger today than it has been in hundreds of years. Eckhart met the problems of contingency and omnipotence, creator-and-creature-from-nothing by making God the only reality and the presence or imprint of God upon nothing, the source of reality in the creature.”

Kenneth Rexroth (1905–1982) American poet, writer, anarchist, academic and conscientious objector

"Eckhart, Brethren of the Free Spirit," from Communalism: From Its Origins to the Twentieth Century (1974), ch. 4
Context: The influence of Meister Eckhart is stronger today than it has been in hundreds of years. Eckhart met the problems of contingency and omnipotence, creator-and-creature-from-nothing by making God the only reality and the presence or imprint of God upon nothing, the source of reality in the creature. Reality in other words was a hierarchically structured participation of the creature in the creator. From the point of view of the creature this process could be reversed. If creatureliness is real, God becomes the Divine Nothing. God is not, as in scholasticism, the final subject of all predicates. He is being as unpredicable. The existence of the creature, in so far as it exists, is the existence of God, and the creature’s experience of God is therefore in the final analysis equally unpredicable. Neither can even be described; both can only be indicated. We can only point at reality, our own or God’s. The soul comes to the realization of God by knowledge, not as in the older Christian mysticism by love. Love is the garment of knowledge. The soul first trains itself by systematic unknowing until at last it confronts the only reality, the only knowledge, God manifest in itself. The soul can say nothing about this experience in the sense of defining it. It can only reveal it to others.

William Winwood Reade photo

“A day will come when the European god of the nineteenth century will be classed with the gods of Olympus and the Nile.”

William Winwood Reade (1838–1875) British historian

Source: The Martyrdom of Man (1872), Chapter IV, "Intellect"

Alain de Botton photo

“It is striking how much more seriously we are likely to be taken after we have been dead a few centuries.”

Source: The Consolations of Philosophy (2000), Chapter IV, Consolation For Inadequacy, p. 163.

Friedrich Hayek photo
Michael Chabon photo

Related topics