
Source: "Science, values and public administration," 1937, p. 189
Source: Engineering cybernetics, (1954), p. vii. About the origin of the word Cybernetics
Source: "Science, values and public administration," 1937, p. 189
Source: Introduction to semantics, 1962, p. 4
Source: The Nature of Belief http://www.xent.com/FoRK-archive/sept97/0213.html
Source: 1930s, "Science, Value and Public Administration", 1937, p. 189
Source: 1980s, Notes on an epistemology for living things, 1981, p.258
“If there is ever conflict between Science and Scripture, the problem must be on the science side.”
Source: Cults, Sects and Questions (c. 1979)
[2011-12-13, Interview with Alvin Plantinga on Where the Conflict Really Lies, Paul, Pardi, Philosophy News, http://www.philosophynews.com/post/2011/12/13/Interview-with-Alvin-Plantinga-on-Where-the-Conflict-Really-Lies.aspx]
Posed question: Are you mainly trying to show that there's no logical conflict even though there might be a methodological conflict?
Source: A Manual of the Steam Engine and Other Prime Movers (1859), p. 31
Lecture II : The Universal Categories, §3. Laws: Nominalism, CP 5.61
Pragmatism and Pragmaticism (1903)
Context: Philosophy, as I understand the word, is a positive theoretical science, and a science in an early stage of development. As such it has no more to do with belief than any other science. Indeed, I am bound to confess that it is at present in so unsettled a condition, that if the ordinary theorems of molecular physics and of archaeology are but the ghosts of beliefs, then to my mind, the doctrines of the philosophers are little better than the ghosts of ghosts. I know this is an extremely heretical opinion.