Webb v. Portland Manufacturing Co., 3 Sumn. Rep. 189 (1838).
“Actual perceptible damage is not indispensable as the foundation of an action; it is sufficient to show the violation of a right, in which case the law will presume damage.”
2 Raym. Rep. 938.
Ashby v. White (1703)
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
John Holt (Lord Chief Justice) 36
English lawyer and Lord Chief Justice of England 1642–1710Related quotes
R. v. Commissioners of Pagham (1828), 8 B. & C. 362.
Source: Attorney General Ken Paxton on Texas Heartbeat Act: We Are Hopeful https://www.ncregister.com/interview/attorney-general-ken-paxton-on-texas-heartbeat-act-we-are-hopeful (6 November 2021)
Zhang Zhijun (2016) cited in " Chinese official reiterates '1992 consensus' mantra http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201612230006.aspx" on Focus Taiwan, 23 December 2016.
2 Raym. Rep. 955.
Ashby v. White (1703)
Copyright is Brain Damage (2015)
“I recognize that this additional material I am now furnishing may further damage my case.”
After the court-ordered release of the White House tapes (5 August 1974)
1970s
Lecture III. The Safeguards of Individual Liberty - 19. Fundamental Rights and the Protected Private Sphere
1940s–1950s, The Political Ideal of the Rule of Law (1955)