Said about Russian reactions in case Finland and Sweden join NATO, quoted in "Russia warns Sweden, Finland about consequences of joining NATO" https://www.firstpost.com/world/russia-warns-sweden-finland-about-consequences-of-joining-nato-10577321.html, Firstpost, 20 April 2022
“Mass communications analysts concentrate on “who sends what information, for what purposes, through what channels, to which people, with what effect”. The information profession is more interested in “who seeks what information, for what purposes, through what channels, from which people and sources, with what success”.”
Source: Information history – an introduction (2009), p. 246.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Brian Campbell Vickery 84
British information theorist 1918–2009Related quotes
As cited in: Merrill J. Riley (1981) Management information systems. p. 114.
1960s, Management misinformation systems, 1967
Source: Meeting the challenge (2009), p. xxii-xxiii; As cited in: Lyn Robinson and David Bawden (2011).
Anatol Rapoport (1969) in: Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. p. 139
1960s
“Lying is not a side effect of what RT does; it is the channel's heart.”
"Mouthpieces for the Kremlin’s propaganda channel aren't brave" https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/masha-gessen-mouthpieces-for-the-kremlins-propaganda-channel-arent-brave/2014/07/29/83fecf2e-1449-11e4-98ee-daea85133bc9_story.html (29 July 2014), The Washington Post, Washington, D.C.
Brace Yourself: The Five Heresies
The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates (2012)
Between Hell and Reason (1945)
Context: The world is what it is, which is to say, nothing much. This is what everyone learned yesterday, thanks to the formidable concert of opinion coming from radios, newspapers, and information agencies. Indeed we are told, in the midst of hundreds of enthusiastic commentaries, that any average city can be wiped out by a bomb the size of a football. American, English, and French newspapers are filled with eloquent essays on the future, the past, the inventors, the cost, the peaceful incentives, the military advantages, and even the life-of-its-own character of the atom bomb.
We can sum it up in one sentence: Our technical civilization has just reached its greatest level of savagery. We will have to choose, in the more or less near future, between collective suicide and the intelligent use of our scientific conquests.
Meanwhile we think there is something indecent in celebrating a discovery whose use has caused the most formidable rage of destruction ever known to man. What will it bring to a world already given over to all the convulsions of violence, incapable of any control, indifferent to justice and the simple happiness of men — a world where science devotes itself to organized murder? No one but the most unrelenting idealists would dare to wonder.