“Philosophy hasn’t made any progress?—If someone scratches where it itches, do we have to see progress? Is it not genuine scratching otherwise, or genuine itching?”

Source: Culture and Value (1980), p. 98e

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update Sept. 27, 2023. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Philosophy hasn’t made any progress?—If someone scratches where it itches, do we have to see progress? Is it not genuin…" by Ludwig Wittgenstein?
Ludwig Wittgenstein photo
Ludwig Wittgenstein 228
Austrian-British philosopher 1889–1951

Related quotes

Alice Roosevelt Longworth photo

“I have a simple philosophy. Fill what's empty. Empty what's full. And scratch where it itches.”

Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884–1980) American writer and prominent socialite

As quoted in The Best (1974), edited by Peter Passell and Leonard Ross.

Ernest Bramah photo

“One learns to itch where one can scratch.”

The Story of Wong Choi and the Merchant Teen King's Thumb
Kai Lung Unrolls His Mat (1928)

Peter Greenaway photo

“Itch to read, scratch to understand.”

Peter Greenaway (1942) British film director

From the ninth book, "The Book of Secrets"
The Pillow Book

Robert Penn Warren photo

“The urge to write poetry is like having an itch. When the itch becomes annoying enough, you scratch it.”

Robert Penn Warren (1905–1989) American poet, novelist, and literary critic

The New York Times (16 December 1969)

Markus Zusak photo
Mark Twain photo
Ramakrishna photo
Herbert A. Simon photo
Peter M. Senge photo
Caitlín R. Kiernan photo

“Personally, I have my doubts that science can be said to be genuinely progressive, but I'm pretty dammed certain that art is not. Which is not to say that it is not accumulative or accretionary.”

Caitlín R. Kiernan (1964) writer

(15 June 2007)
Unfit for Mass Consumption (blog entries), 2007
Context: Art is not science. Even when art is about science, it is still art. There cannot be consensus, in the sense that science strives for meaningful consensus. And unlike science, art is not progressive. Personally, I have my doubts that science can be said to be genuinely progressive, but I'm pretty dammed certain that art is not. Which is not to say that it is not accumulative or accretionary. But the belief that sf writers are out there forecasting the future, that they have some social responsibility to do so, that's malarky, if you ask me. Writers of sf can only, at best, make educated guesses, and usually those guesses are wrong, and clumping together to form a consensus does not in any way insure against history unfolding in one of those other, unpredicted directions. People love to pick out the occasional instances where Jules Verne and William Gibson got it right; they rarely ever point fingers at their miscalls.

Related topics