
Doe d. Willis and others v. Martin and others (1790), 4 T. R. 65.
Grigby v. Oakes (1801), 1 Bos. & Pull. 528.
Doe d. Willis and others v. Martin and others (1790), 4 T. R. 65.
Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature (1979). 167.
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569 (1998) (Scalia, concurring).
1990s
“The daimonic arises from the ground of being rather than the self as such.”
Source: Love and Will (1969), p. 123
Context: The daimonic refers to the power of nature rather than the superego, and is beyond good and evil. Nor is it man's 'recall to himself' as Heidegger and later Fromm have argued, for its source lies in those realms where the self is rooted in natural forces which go beyond the self and are felt as the grasp of fate upon us. The daimonic arises from the ground of being rather than the self as such.
“The object of Parliament is to substitute argument for fisticuffs.”
Speech in the House of Commons (June 6, 1951) ; in Churchill by Himself (2008), ed. Langworth, PublicAffairs, p. 22 ISBN 1586486381
Post-war years (1945–1955)
In re De Nicols. De Nicols v. Curlieb (1898), L. R. 1 C. D. [1898], p. 410.
George Herbert Mead (1927;314), as cited in: Marcus Persson (2007), Mellan människor och ting. En interaktionistisk analys av samlandet, p. 19
Roberts v. Gwyrfai District Council (1899), L. R. 2 C. D. 614.